PWRD vs. PIPE

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PWRD returned 23.10% vs 35.38% for PIPE. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.

Performance

PWRD vs. PIPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 14.65% return, which is significantly lower than PIPE's 30.99% return.

PWRD

• 1D: -2.91%
• 1M: -4.26%
• 6M: 9.17%
• YTD: 14.65%
• 1Y: 23.10%
• 3Y*: 28.28%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PIPE

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 5.61%
• 6M: 29.27%
• YTD: 30.99%
• 1Y: 35.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. PIPE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	14.65%	21.43%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	30.99%	0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and PIPE is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.04
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.23

The correlation between PWRD and PIPE shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PWRD vs. PIPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWRD

PWRD Risk / Return Rank: 33
PWRD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 28
PWRD Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
PWRD Omega Ratio Rank: 28
PWRD Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PWRD Martin Ratio Rank: 40

PIPE

PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 87
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWRD vs. PIPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWRD	PIPE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.86	2.39	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.30	3.23	-1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.41	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	4.85	-3.21
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.12	11.69	-6.57

PWRD vs. PIPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWRD Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is lower than the PIPE Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWRD and PIPE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. PIPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, which is greater than PIPE's maximum drawdown of -15.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and PIPE.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWRD	PIPE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.87%	-15.69%	-10.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.12%	-7.33%	-6.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.39%	-1.32%	-9.07%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.08%	-4.00%	-1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.52%	3.03%	+1.49%

Volatility

PWRD vs. PIPE - Volatility Comparison

TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) has a higher volatility of 12.09% compared to Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) at 5.48%. This indicates that PWRD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIPE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PWRD	PIPE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.09%	5.48%	+6.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.61%	11.69%	+10.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.90%	14.88%	+12.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.23%	18.68%	+4.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.23%	18.68%	+4.55%

PWRD vs. PIPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PWRD and PIPE have an expense ratio of 0.75%.

Dividends

PWRD vs. PIPE - Dividend Comparison

PWRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than PIPE's 3.63% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.63%	3.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF	0.06%	0.22%	0.49%	0.78%	0.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWRD and PIPE in my portfolio?

PWRD and PIPE have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PWRD or PIPE?

PWRD has higher volatility (12.09%) compared to PIPE (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWRD dropped -25.87% vs PIPE's -15.69%.

Which ETF is better, PWRD or PIPE?

On 1-year performance, PIPE leads with 35.38% vs 23.10% for PWRD. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PIPE has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PWRD or PIPE?

Over the 1-year period, PIPE has performed better with a 35.38% return vs 23.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWRD or PIPE?

PWRD and PIPE have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWRD or PIPE?

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.63%, compared with 0.06% for PWRD.

What is the main difference between PWRD and PIPE?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and Invesco.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.