PIPE vs. XLG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIPE is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. PIPE is actively managed, while XLG is passively managed. Over the past year, PIPE returned 27.93% vs 23.61% for XLG. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PIPE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XLG.

Performance

PIPE vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIPE achieves a 25.20% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 3.55% return.

PIPE

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -5.39%
• YTD: 25.20%
• 6M: 26.77%
• 1Y: 27.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLG

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: -3.59%
• YTD: 3.55%
• 6M: 3.44%
• 1Y: 23.61%
• 3Y*: 22.12%
• 5Y*: 14.84%
• 10Y*: 17.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIPE vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	25.20%	0.14%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	3.55%	15.42%

Correlation

The correlation between PIPE and XLG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.14

The correlation between PIPE and XLG shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PIPE vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PIPE	XLG
Energy	96.7%	2.4%
Utilities	2.0%	-
Financial Services	1.3%	9.0%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Communication Services	-	16.0%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	5.2%
Healthcare	-	7.0%
Industrials	-	1.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	46.8%

Return for Risk

PIPE vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIPE

PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 61
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 47
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 50
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIPE vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIPE	XLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	1.71	+0.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	2.33	+0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.31	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	1.91	+1.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	6.89	+2.57

PIPE vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIPE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIPE and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PIPE vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIPE drawdown since its inception was -15.69%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPE and XLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIPE	XLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.69%	-52.39%	+36.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.33%	-12.41%	+5.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-20.70%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.02%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-30.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.68%	-5.13%	-0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-7.63%	+3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.44%	-0.48%

Volatility

PIPE vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) at 4.74%. This indicates that PIPE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIPE	XLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	4.74%	+0.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	10.60%	+0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	13.86%	+0.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	18.77%	-0.15%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	18.89%	-0.27%

PIPE vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIPE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIPE vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PIPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than XLG's 0.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.10%	3.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.82%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIPE and XLG in my portfolio?

PIPE and XLG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIPE or XLG?

PIPE has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to XLG (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPE dropped -15.69% vs XLG's -52.39%.

Which ETF is better, PIPE or XLG?

On 1-year performance, PIPE leads with 27.93% vs 23.61% for XLG. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PIPE or XLG?

Over the 1-year period, PIPE has performed better with a 27.93% return vs 23.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIPE or XLG?

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIPE or XLG?

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 0.82% for XLG.

What is the main difference between PIPE and XLG?

PIPE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PIPE and 0.20% for XLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PIPE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.