PIPE vs. EMKT

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and EMKT (Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PIPE is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by Invesco, while EMKT is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund actively managed by Lazard. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions. PIPE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for EMKT.

Performance

PIPE vs. EMKT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIPE achieves a 27.15% return, which is significantly higher than EMKT's 25.38% return.

PIPE

• 1D: 1.56%
• 1M: -3.91%
• YTD: 27.15%
• 6M: 27.22%
• 1Y: 31.00%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMKT

• 1D: -5.64%
• 1M: 3.35%
• YTD: 25.38%
• 6M: 26.06%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIPE vs. EMKT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	27.15%	4.73%
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	25.38%	-1.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PIPE and EMKT is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2025	-0.14

Return for Risk

PIPE vs. EMKT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIPE

PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 72
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 63

EMKT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIPE vs. EMKT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF (EMKT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIPE	EMKT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.88	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.45	—	—

Drawdowns

PIPE vs. EMKT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIPE drawdown since its inception was -15.69%, which is greater than EMKT's maximum drawdown of -14.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPE and EMKT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIPE	EMKT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.69%	-14.21%	-1.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.33%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.20%	-5.64%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-3.10%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PIPE	EMKT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.64%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.18%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.54%	24.71%	-10.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.64%	24.71%	-6.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.64%	24.71%	-6.07%

PIPE vs. EMKT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIPE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than EMKT's 0.74% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIPE vs. EMKT - Dividend Comparison

PIPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.73%, more than EMKT's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
EMKT Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF	0.44%	0.00%
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	3.73%	3.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIPE and EMKT in my portfolio?

PIPE and EMKT have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PIPE or EMKT?

On fees, EMKT is cheaper at 0.74% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIPE or EMKT?

EMKT is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIPE or EMKT?

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 3.73%, compared with 0.44% for EMKT.

What is the main difference between PIPE and EMKT?

PIPE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EMKT is Emerging Markets Diversified. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Lazard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PIPE and 0.74% for EMKT.