PIPE vs. PXJ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PIPE (Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF) and PXJ (Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF) are both Energy Equities funds from Invesco. PIPE is actively managed, while PXJ is passively managed. Over the past year, PIPE returned 27.93% vs 67.29% for PXJ. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PIPE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for PXJ.

Performance

PIPE vs. PXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PIPE achieves a 25.20% return, which is significantly lower than PXJ's 41.96% return.

PIPE

• 1D: 1.02%
• 1M: -5.39%
• YTD: 25.20%
• 6M: 26.77%
• 1Y: 27.93%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXJ

• 1D: 1.75%
• 1M: -8.73%
• YTD: 41.96%
• 6M: 42.19%
• 1Y: 67.29%
• 3Y*: 24.27%
• 5Y*: 18.02%
• 10Y*: -1.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PIPE vs. PXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	25.20%	0.14%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	41.96%	6.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PIPE and PXJ is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.52

The correlation between PIPE and PXJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

PIPE vs. PXJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PIPE	PXJ
Energy	96.7%	93.9%
Utilities	2.0%	2.1%
Financial Services	1.3%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	5.9%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-

Return for Risk

PIPE vs. PXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PIPE

PIPE Risk / Return Rank: 61
PIPE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PIPE Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
PIPE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PIPE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
PIPE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

PXJ

PXJ Risk / Return Rank: 81
PXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
PXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
PXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
PXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PIPE vs. PXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) and Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PIPE	PXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.94	2.53	-0.59
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.63	3.25	-0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.40	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.83	5.26	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.45	17.74	-8.28

PIPE vs. PXJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PIPE Sharpe Ratio is 1.94, which is comparable to the PXJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PIPE and PXJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PIPE vs. PXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PIPE drawdown since its inception was -15.69%, smaller than the maximum PXJ drawdown of -94.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PIPE and PXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PIPE	PXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.69%	-94.82%	+79.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.33%	-12.86%	+5.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-40.03%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-87.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.68%	-67.56%	+61.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.02%	-55.69%	+51.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.96%	3.89%	-0.93%

Volatility

PIPE vs. PXJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF (PIPE) is 5.36%, while Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF (PXJ) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that PIPE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PIPE	PXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	8.70%	-3.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.13%	18.60%	-7.47%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.49%	26.82%	-12.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	34.48%	-15.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.62%	39.37%	-20.75%

PIPE vs. PXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PIPE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than PXJ's 0.63% expense ratio.

Dividends

PIPE vs. PXJ - Dividend Comparison

PIPE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than PXJ's 3.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PIPE Invesco SteelPath MLP & Energy Infrastructure ETF	4.10%	3.74%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXJ Invesco Dynamic Oil & Gas Services ETF	3.09%	2.91%	3.34%	1.99%	0.65%	2.40%	4.72%	1.87%	0.99%	2.75%	1.18%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PIPE and PXJ in my portfolio?

PIPE and PXJ have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PIPE or PXJ?

PXJ has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to PIPE (5.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PIPE dropped -15.69% vs PXJ's -94.82%.

Which ETF is better, PIPE or PXJ?

On 1-year performance, PXJ leads with 67.29% vs 27.93% for PIPE. On fees, PXJ is cheaper at 0.63% per year. On volatility, PIPE has been the lower-risk option at 5.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PIPE or PXJ?

Over the 1-year period, PXJ has performed better with a 67.29% return vs 27.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PIPE or PXJ?

PXJ is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PIPE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PIPE or PXJ?

PIPE has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 3.09% for PXJ.

What is the main difference between PIPE and PXJ?

Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PIPE and 0.63% for PXJ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.