PWRD vs. MUSE
PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and MUSE (TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while MUSE is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for MUSE.
Performance
PWRD vs. MUSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWRD achieves a 19.81% return, which is significantly higher than MUSE's 2.30% return.
PWRD
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 3.10%
- YTD
- 19.81%
- 6M
- 18.04%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MUSE
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 2.30%
- 6M
- 2.82%
- 1Y
- 8.14%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD vs. MUSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 19.81% | 7.66% |
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF | 2.30% | 4.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRD and MUSE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2025 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRD vs. MUSE — Risk / Return Rank
PWRD
MUSE
PWRD vs. MUSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PWRD | MUSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.91 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.85 | -0.54 |
Drawdowns
PWRD vs. MUSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, which is greater than MUSE's maximum drawdown of -3.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and MUSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRD | MUSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -3.63% | -10.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -2.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -0.10% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.17% | -0.43% | -2.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.68% | — |
Volatility
PWRD vs. MUSE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRD | MUSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.86% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.03% | 2.81% | +21.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 3.87% | +20.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.03% | 3.87% | +20.16% |
PWRD vs. MUSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than MUSE's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRD vs. MUSE - Dividend Comparison
PWRD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF | 7.70% | 7.35% | 0.75% |
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRD and MUSE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MUSE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MUSE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
MUSE has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 0.00% for PWRD.
PWRD is categorized as Energy Equities, while MUSE is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.56% for MUSE.
Find the right allocation for PWRD and MUSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer