MUSE vs. AIFD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MUSE (TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF) and AIFD (TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUSE is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW, while AIFD is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by TCW. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MUSE returned 8.39% vs 104.68% for AIFD. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUSE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for AIFD.

Performance

MUSE vs. AIFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSE achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly lower than AIFD's 52.46% return.

MUSE

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 8.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIFD

• 1D: 3.28%
• 1M: 20.62%
• YTD: 52.46%
• 6M: 53.64%
• 1Y: 104.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSE vs. AIFD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	2.40%	8.25%	0.34%
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	52.46%	28.30%	3.79%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSE and AIFD is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024	0.38

Return for Risk

MUSE vs. AIFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSE

MUSE Risk / Return Rank: 81
MUSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MUSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MUSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MUSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MUSE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

AIFD

AIFD Risk / Return Rank: 94
AIFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
AIFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
AIFD Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AIFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AIFD Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSE vs. AIFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUSE	AIFD	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	4.13	-1.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.76	4.56	+0.20
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.62	+0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	9.09	-5.80
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	38.58	-26.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUSE vs. AIFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the AIFD Sharpe Ratio of 4.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSE and AIFD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUSE	AIFD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	4.13	-1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	1.64	+0.24

Drawdowns

MUSE vs. AIFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSE drawdown since its inception was -3.63%, smaller than the maximum AIFD drawdown of -33.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSE and AIFD.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSE	AIFD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-33.20%	+29.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-11.75%	+9.21%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-5.73%	+5.30%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	2.77%	-2.09%

Volatility

MUSE vs. AIFD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) is 0.85%, while TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF (AIFD) has a volatility of 8.66%. This indicates that MUSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSE	AIFD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	8.66%	-7.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	19.75%	-17.34%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81%	25.48%	-22.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.87%	29.34%	-25.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.87%	29.34%	-25.47%

MUSE vs. AIFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than AIFD's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUSE vs. AIFD - Dividend Comparison

MUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, while AIFD has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AIFD TCW Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	7.69%	7.35%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUSE and AIFD in my portfolio?

MUSE and AIFD have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUSE or AIFD?

AIFD has higher volatility (8.66%) compared to MUSE (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSE dropped -3.63% vs AIFD's -33.20%.

Which ETF is better, MUSE or AIFD?

On 1-year performance, AIFD leads with 104.68% vs 8.39% for MUSE. On fees, MUSE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, MUSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUSE or AIFD?

Over the 1-year period, AIFD has performed better with a 104.68% return vs 8.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUSE or AIFD?

MUSE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for AIFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUSE or AIFD?

MUSE has the higher dividend yield at 7.69%, compared with 0.00% for AIFD.

What is the main difference between MUSE and AIFD?

MUSE is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while AIFD is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for MUSE and 0.75% for AIFD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AIFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.13 vs 3.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.