MUSE vs. IGCB

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MUSE (TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF) and IGCB (TCW Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - MUSE is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by TCW, while IGCB is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Actively Managed. MUSE is actively managed, while IGCB is passively managed. Over the past year, MUSE returned 8.39% vs 5.78% for IGCB. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. MUSE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IGCB.

Performance

MUSE vs. IGCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSE achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly higher than IGCB's 0.38% return.

MUSE

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 8.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IGCB

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.50%
• 1Y: 5.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSE vs. IGCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	2.40%	8.25%	0.34%
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF	0.38%	8.42%	-0.39%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSE and IGCB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2024	0.55

The correlation between MUSE and IGCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

MUSE vs. IGCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSE

MUSE Risk / Return Rank: 81
MUSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MUSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MUSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MUSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MUSE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

IGCB

IGCB Risk / Return Rank: 40
IGCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
IGCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
IGCB Omega Ratio Rank: 41
IGCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
IGCB Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSE vs. IGCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUSE	IGCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	1.49	+1.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.76	2.12	+2.64
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.27	+0.44
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	1.91	+1.38
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	5.89	+6.36
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUSE vs. IGCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is higher than the IGCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSE and IGCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUSE	IGCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	1.49	+1.52
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	1.13	+0.74

Drawdowns

MUSE vs. IGCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSE drawdown since its inception was -3.63%, smaller than the maximum IGCB drawdown of -4.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSE and IGCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSE	IGCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-4.20%	+0.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-2.91%	+0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.02%	+1.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-0.93%	+0.50%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	0.94%	-0.26%

Volatility

MUSE vs. IGCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) is 0.85%, while TCW Corporate Bond ETF (IGCB) has a volatility of 1.33%. This indicates that MUSE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSE	IGCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	1.33%	-0.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	2.80%	-0.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81%	3.91%	-1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.87%	4.82%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.87%	4.82%	-0.95%

MUSE vs. IGCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than IGCB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUSE vs. IGCB - Dividend Comparison

MUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than IGCB's 4.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
IGCB TCW Corporate Bond ETF	4.74%	4.52%	0.66%
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	7.69%	7.35%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUSE and IGCB in my portfolio?

MUSE and IGCB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUSE or IGCB?

IGCB has higher volatility (1.33%) compared to MUSE (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSE dropped -3.63% vs IGCB's -4.20%.

Which ETF is better, MUSE or IGCB?

On 1-year performance, MUSE leads with 8.39% vs 5.78% for IGCB. On fees, IGCB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, MUSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUSE or IGCB?

Over the 1-year period, MUSE has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 5.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUSE or IGCB?

IGCB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for MUSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUSE or IGCB?

MUSE has the higher dividend yield at 7.69%, compared with 4.74% for IGCB.

What is the main difference between MUSE and IGCB?

MUSE is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while IGCB is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for MUSE and 0.35% for IGCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.