MUSE vs. DMX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

MUSE (TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF) and DMX (DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, MUSE returned 8.39% vs 6.64% for DMX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. MUSE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for DMX.

Performance

MUSE vs. DMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MUSE achieves a 2.40% return, which is significantly higher than DMX's 1.49% return.

MUSE

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.95%
• YTD: 2.40%
• 6M: 3.02%
• 1Y: 8.39%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DMX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: 0.38%
• YTD: 1.49%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 6.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MUSE vs. DMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	2.40%	8.25%	-0.59%
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF	1.49%	7.23%	-0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between MUSE and DMX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.47

Return for Risk

MUSE vs. DMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MUSE

MUSE Risk / Return Rank: 81
MUSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
MUSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
MUSE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MUSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
MUSE Martin Ratio Rank: 66

DMX

DMX Risk / Return Rank: 90
DMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
DMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
DMX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
DMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
DMX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MUSE vs. DMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	MUSE	DMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.00	2.90	+0.10
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.76	4.63	+0.13
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.71	1.63	+0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	5.17	-1.87
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.25	21.74	-9.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

MUSE vs. DMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MUSE Sharpe Ratio is 3.00, which is comparable to the DMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MUSE and DMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	MUSE	DMX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.00	2.90	+0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	1.86	+0.01

Drawdowns

MUSE vs. DMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MUSE drawdown since its inception was -3.63%, which is greater than DMX's maximum drawdown of -2.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MUSE and DMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	MUSE	DMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-2.65%	-0.98%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.54%	-1.28%	-1.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.11%	+0.11%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.43%	-0.24%	-0.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.68%	0.31%	+0.37%

Volatility

MUSE vs. DMX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF (MUSE) and DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF (DMX) have volatilities of 0.85% and 0.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	MUSE	DMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.85%	0.88%	-0.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.41%	1.69%	+0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81%	2.30%	+0.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.87%	3.15%	+0.72%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.87%	3.15%	+0.72%

MUSE vs. DMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MUSE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than DMX's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

MUSE vs. DMX - Dividend Comparison

MUSE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than DMX's 5.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DMX DoubleLine Multi-Sector Income ETF	5.90%	5.96%	0.42%
MUSE TCW Multisector Credit Income ETF	7.69%	7.35%	0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both MUSE and DMX in my portfolio?

MUSE and DMX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, MUSE or DMX?

DMX has higher volatility (0.88%) compared to MUSE (0.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MUSE dropped -3.63% vs DMX's -2.65%.

Which ETF is better, MUSE or DMX?

On 1-year performance, MUSE leads with 8.39% vs 6.64% for DMX. On fees, DMX is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, MUSE or DMX?

Over the 1-year period, MUSE has performed better with a 8.39% return vs 6.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, MUSE or DMX?

DMX is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for MUSE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, MUSE or DMX?

MUSE has the higher dividend yield at 7.69%, compared with 5.90% for DMX.

What is the main difference between MUSE and DMX?

They also come from different issuers: TCW and DoubleLine. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for MUSE and 0.50% for DMX.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUSE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 2.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.