PWRD vs. DRAM
PWRD (TCW Transform Systems ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWRD is a Energy Equities fund actively managed by TCW, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWRD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
PWRD vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PWRD
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 18.40%
- 6M
- 18.29%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRAM
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 19.20%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PWRD vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PWRD TCW Transform Systems ETF | 14.81% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 140.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWRD and DRAM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWRD vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWRD vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum DRAM drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWRD | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.12% | -19.97% | +5.85% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.91% | -6.74% | +4.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.18% | -3.06% | -0.12% |
Volatility
PWRD vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWRD | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.91% | 87.02% | -62.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.91% | 87.02% | -62.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.91% | 87.02% | -62.11% |
PWRD vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWRD vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
Neither PWRD nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PWRD and DRAM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.
PWRD and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PWRD is categorized as Energy Equities, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.65% for DRAM.
Find the right allocation for PWRD and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer