PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWRD vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWRD vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PWRD

1D
1.68%
1M
0.32%
YTD
18.40%
6M
18.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DRAM

1D
-0.17%
1M
19.20%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWRD vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)
PWRD
TCW Transform Systems ETF
14.81%
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
140.78%

Correlation

The correlation between PWRD and DRAM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWRD vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Transform Systems ETF (PWRD) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PWRD vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWRD vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWRD drawdown since its inception was -14.12%, smaller than the maximum DRAM drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWRD and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRDDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.12%

-19.97%

+5.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-6.74%

+4.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.18%

-3.06%

-0.12%

Volatility

PWRD vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRDDRAMDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

87.02%

-62.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.91%

87.02%

-62.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.91%

87.02%

-62.11%

PWRD vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWRD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PWRD vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

Neither PWRD nor DRAM has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


PWRD and DRAM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PWRD.

PWRD and DRAM have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PWRD is categorized as Energy Equities, while DRAM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: TCW and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PWRD and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWRD and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer