PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWR vs. ROBO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PWR vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than ROBO's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed ROBO with an annualized return of 41.17%, while ROBO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.


PWR

1D
3.58%
1M
-9.27%
YTD
67.76%
6M
61.62%
1Y
97.74%
3Y*
56.60%
5Y*
50.60%
10Y*
41.17%

ROBO

1D
0.69%
1M
-2.34%
YTD
19.75%
6M
18.31%
1Y
47.52%
3Y*
12.64%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
13.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWR vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
67.76%33.70%46.60%51.70%24.63%59.50%77.74%35.84%-22.93%12.22%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
19.75%23.71%-1.28%23.74%-33.92%15.34%45.26%29.51%-20.92%44.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PWR and ROBO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013

0.58

The correlation between PWR and ROBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PWR vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWR
PWR Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

ROBO
ROBO Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ROBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ROBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
ROBO Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ROBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ROBO Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWR vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PWRROBODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.31

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.73

2.58

+3.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.09

9.88

+8.21

PWR vs. ROBO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWR Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the ROBO Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWR and ROBO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PWR vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and ROBO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PWRROBODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.07%

-43.65%

-53.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.11%

-17.35%

+0.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.89%

-27.92%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.89%

-43.65%

+9.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.53%

-43.65%

-1.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.87%

-8.12%

-1.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-46.84%

-12.92%

-33.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.41%

4.53%

+0.88%

Volatility

PWR vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison

Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) at 10.66%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PWRROBODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.07%

10.66%

+2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.74%

19.92%

+10.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.12%

24.56%

+12.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.79%

23.92%

+11.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.78%

23.30%

+10.48%

Dividends

PWR vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison

PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than ROBO's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWR
Quanta Services, Inc.
0.06%0.09%0.09%0.15%0.25%0.16%0.29%0.42%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ROBO
ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF
0.35%0.42%0.55%0.05%0.00%0.18%0.20%0.37%0.37%0.02%0.19%0.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PWR and ROBO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PWR has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to ROBO (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs ROBO's -43.65%.

PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PWR and ROBO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer