PWR vs. ROBO
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) is a stock, while ROBO (ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF) is Robotics fund tracking the ROBO Global Robotics and Automation TR Index. Over the past 10 years, PWR returned 41.17%/yr vs 13.12%/yr for ROBO. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
PWR vs. ROBO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 67.76% return, which is significantly higher than ROBO's 19.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has outperformed ROBO with an annualized return of 41.17%, while ROBO has yielded a comparatively lower 13.12% annualized return.
PWR
- 1D
- 3.58%
- 1M
- -9.27%
- YTD
- 67.76%
- 6M
- 61.62%
- 1Y
- 97.74%
- 3Y*
- 56.60%
- 5Y*
- 50.60%
- 10Y*
- 41.17%
ROBO
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 19.75%
- 6M
- 18.31%
- 1Y
- 47.52%
- 3Y*
- 12.64%
- 5Y*
- 5.51%
- 10Y*
- 13.12%
PWR vs. ROBO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 67.76% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 19.75% | 23.71% | -1.28% | 23.74% | -33.92% | 15.34% | 45.26% | 29.51% | -20.92% | 44.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and ROBO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 22, 2013 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PWR and ROBO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. ROBO — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
ROBO
PWR vs. ROBO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWR | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.87 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.31 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.73 | 2.58 | +3.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.09 | 9.88 | +8.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWR vs. ROBO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, which is greater than ROBO's maximum drawdown of -43.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and ROBO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -43.65% | -53.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -17.35% | +0.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | -27.92% | -5.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -43.65% | +9.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | -43.65% | -1.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.87% | -8.12% | -1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.84% | -12.92% | -33.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.41% | 4.53% | +0.88% |
Volatility
PWR vs. ROBO - Volatility Comparison
Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) has a higher volatility of 13.07% compared to ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF (ROBO) at 10.66%. This indicates that PWR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ROBO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | ROBO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.07% | 10.66% | +2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.74% | 19.92% | +10.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.12% | 24.56% | +12.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.79% | 23.92% | +11.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.78% | 23.30% | +10.48% |
Dividends
PWR vs. ROBO - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, less than ROBO's 0.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBO ROBO Global Robotics & Automation Index ETF | 0.35% | 0.42% | 0.55% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.37% | 0.37% | 0.02% | 0.19% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWR and ROBO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWR has higher volatility (13.07%) compared to ROBO (10.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs ROBO's -43.65%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWR and ROBO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer