PWR vs. FTLF
PWR (Quanta Services, Inc.) and FTLF (FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock) are both stocks. PWR operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while FTLF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 10 years, PWR returned 41.17%/yr vs 51.38%/yr for FTLF. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PWR vs. FTLF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWR achieves a 69.35% return, which is significantly higher than FTLF's -32.02% return. Over the past 10 years, PWR has underperformed FTLF with an annualized return of 41.17%, while FTLF has yielded a comparatively higher 51.38% annualized return.
PWR
- 1D
- 3.86%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 69.35%
- 6M
- 65.83%
- 1Y
- 87.57%
- 3Y*
- 53.96%
- 5Y*
- 51.38%
- 10Y*
- 41.17%
FTLF
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- 8.22%
- YTD
- -32.02%
- 6M
- -32.81%
- 1Y
- -13.66%
- 3Y*
- 9.17%
- 5Y*
- 17.80%
- 10Y*
- 51.38%
PWR vs. FTLF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 69.35% | 33.70% | 46.60% | 51.70% | 24.63% | 59.50% | 77.74% | 35.84% | -22.93% | 12.22% |
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | -32.02% | -0.18% | 70.68% | 19.75% | -0.31% | 196.30% | 53.19% | 3,182.89% | 78.96% | -74.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWR and FTLF is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2007 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
PWR:
$7.28
FTLF:
$0.68
PWR:
98.14
FTLF:
16.37
PWR:
4.86
FTLF:
1.80
PWR:
3.61
FTLF:
1.57
PWR:
$29.99B
FTLF:
$70.56M
PWR:
$4.08B
FTLF:
$28.73M
PWR:
$2.40B
FTLF:
$11.02M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWR vs. FTLF — Risk / Return Rank
PWR
FTLF
PWR vs. FTLF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) and FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWR | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.00 | +0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.15 | -0.24 | +5.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.35 | -0.46 | +15.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWR vs. FTLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWR drawdown since its inception was -97.07%, roughly equal to the maximum FTLF drawdown of -99.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWR and FTLF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWR | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.07% | -99.68% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -57.23% | +40.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.89% | -57.23% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.89% | -57.23% | +23.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.53% | -89.06% | +43.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.02% | -46.72% | +37.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.78% | -70.83% | +24.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.73% | 29.78% | -24.05% |
Volatility
PWR vs. FTLF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) is 15.06%, while FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a volatility of 21.73%. This indicates that PWR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWR | FTLF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.06% | 21.73% | -6.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.02% | 40.57% | -9.55% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.48% | 54.34% | -15.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.00% | 46.02% | -10.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.84% | 305.95% | -272.11% |
Dividends
PWR vs. FTLF - Dividend Comparison
PWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%, while FTLF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PWR Quanta Services, Inc. | 0.06% | 0.09% | 0.09% | 0.15% | 0.25% | 0.16% | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.13% |
Financials
PWR vs. FTLF - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Quanta Services, Inc. and FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PWR and FTLF have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTLF has higher volatility (21.73%) compared to PWR (15.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWR dropped -97.07% vs FTLF's -99.68%.
PWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs -0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWR and FTLF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer