PortfoliosLab logo
FTLF vs. CDNS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between FTLF and CDNS is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

FTLF vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FTLF:

-0.04

CDNS:

0.21

Sortino Ratio

FTLF:

0.23

CDNS:

0.71

Omega Ratio

FTLF:

1.03

CDNS:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

FTLF:

-0.13

CDNS:

0.42

Martin Ratio

FTLF:

-0.38

CDNS:

0.83

Ulcer Index

FTLF:

13.31%

CDNS:

14.61%

Daily Std Dev

FTLF:

51.66%

CDNS:

41.74%

Max Drawdown

FTLF:

-99.35%

CDNS:

-93.13%

Current Drawdown

FTLF:

-17.37%

CDNS:

-2.37%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FTLF:

$139.45M

CDNS:

$87.21B

EPS

FTLF:

$0.91

CDNS:

$3.95

PE Ratio

FTLF:

16.33

CDNS:

80.86

PEG Ratio

FTLF:

0.00

CDNS:

3.36

PS Ratio

FTLF:

2.16

CDNS:

17.89

PB Ratio

FTLF:

4.09

CDNS:

18.22

Total Revenue (TTM)

FTLF:

$62.93M

CDNS:

$4.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FTLF:

$27.01M

CDNS:

$4.56B

EBITDA (TTM)

FTLF:

$12.89M

CDNS:

$1.64B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLF achieves a -11.29% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 6.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLF has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 65.42%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 32.34% annualized return.


FTLF

YTD

-11.29%

1M

17.75%

6M

-12.58%

1Y

-2.18%

5Y*

75.66%

10Y*

65.42%

CDNS

YTD

6.09%

1M

20.60%

6M

5.19%

1Y

8.76%

5Y*

31.29%

10Y*

32.34%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FTLF vs. CDNS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FTLF is 4444
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FTLF is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FTLF is 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FTLF is 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FTLF is 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FTLF is 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

CDNS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CDNS is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CDNS is 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CDNS is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CDNS is 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FTLF vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FTLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the CDNS Sharpe Ratio of 0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLF and CDNS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

FTLF vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTLF nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FTLF vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than CDNS's maximum drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and CDNS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FTLF vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison

FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a higher volatility of 18.14% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 10.79%. This indicates that FTLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

FTLF vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B20212022202320242025
15.01M
1.24B
(FTLF) Total Revenue
(CDNS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FTLF vs. CDNS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
41.4%
95.9%
(FTLF) Gross Margin
(CDNS) Gross Margin
FTLF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock reported a gross profit of 6.21M and revenue of 15.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.4%.

CDNS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.19B and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 95.9%.

FTLF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock reported an operating income of 2.88M and revenue of 15.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 19.2%.

CDNS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 361.52M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.

FTLF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock reported a net income of 2.07M and revenue of 15.01M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.

CDNS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Cadence Design Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 273.58M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 22.0%.