FTLF vs. CDNS
Compare and contrast key facts about FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS).
Performance
FTLF vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTLF vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | -25.63% | -0.18% | 70.68% | 19.75% | -0.31% | 196.30% | 53.19% | 3,182.89% | 78.96% | -74.74% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | -10.36% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Fundamentals
FTLF:
$0.68
CDNS:
$4.06
FTLF:
17.87
CDNS:
69.06
FTLF:
1.97
CDNS:
5.27
FTLF:
1.71
CDNS:
14.46
FTLF:
$70.56M
CDNS:
$5.30B
FTLF:
$28.73M
CDNS:
$5.09B
FTLF:
$11.02M
CDNS:
$1.74B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTLF achieves a -25.63% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's -10.36% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLF has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 56.48%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 28.05% annualized return.
FTLF
- 1D
- -14.79%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- -25.63%
- 6M
- -38.58%
- 1Y
- 2.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 56.48%
CDNS
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -7.64%
- YTD
- -10.36%
- 6M
- -20.39%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 14.64%
- 10Y*
- 28.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTLF vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
FTLF
CDNS
FTLF vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTLF | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | 0.21 | -0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.08 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | 0.36 | -0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.00 | 0.80 | -0.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTLF | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | 0.21 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.42 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.84 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.22 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTLF and CDNS is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTLF vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTLF nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
FTLF vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than CDNS's maximum drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and CDNS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTLF | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.68% | -93.13% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.71% | -28.09% | -13.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.11% | -29.59% | -13.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -32.12% | -56.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.71% | -24.96% | -16.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.10% | -39.79% | -31.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.26% | 12.71% | +4.55% |
Volatility
FTLF vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a higher volatility of 19.97% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 7.54%. This indicates that FTLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTLF | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.97% | 7.54% | +12.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.15% | 25.41% | +6.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.33% | 39.60% | +12.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.72% | 35.24% | +10.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 305.81% | 33.42% | +272.39% |
Financials
FTLF vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities