FTLF vs. CDNS
FTLF (FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock) and CDNS (Cadence Design Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. FTLF operates in Packaged Foods (Consumer Defensive), while CDNS operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 10 years, FTLF returned 52.21%/yr vs 31.90%/yr for CDNS. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FTLF vs. CDNS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FTLF achieves a -27.17% return, which is significantly lower than CDNS's 21.27% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLF has outperformed CDNS with an annualized return of 52.21%, while CDNS has yielded a comparatively lower 31.90% annualized return.
FTLF
- 1D
- 9.42%
- 1M
- 17.68%
- YTD
- -27.17%
- 6M
- -27.39%
- 1Y
- -8.78%
- 3Y*
- 11.36%
- 5Y*
- 20.06%
- 10Y*
- 52.21%
CDNS
- 1D
- -2.57%
- 1M
- 1.46%
- YTD
- 21.27%
- 6M
- 19.60%
- 1Y
- 29.13%
- 3Y*
- 18.93%
- 5Y*
- 22.93%
- 10Y*
- 31.90%
FTLF vs. CDNS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | -27.17% | -0.18% | 70.68% | 19.75% | -0.31% | 196.30% | 53.19% | 3,182.89% | 78.96% | -74.74% |
CDNS Cadence Design Systems, Inc. | 21.27% | 4.03% | 10.31% | 69.55% | -13.80% | 36.59% | 96.70% | 59.52% | 3.97% | 65.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FTLF and CDNS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 2, 2007 | 0.05 |
Fundamentals
FTLF:
$0.68
CDNS:
$4.28
FTLF:
17.50
CDNS:
88.48
FTLF:
1.93
CDNS:
6.75
FTLF:
1.68
CDNS:
18.74
FTLF:
$70.56M
CDNS:
$5.53B
FTLF:
$28.73M
CDNS:
$4.91B
FTLF:
$11.02M
CDNS:
$1.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTLF vs. CDNS — Risk / Return Rank
FTLF
CDNS
FTLF vs. CDNS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FTLF | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.16 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 1.01 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.30 | 2.14 | -2.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FTLF vs. CDNS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than CDNS's maximum drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and CDNS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTLF | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.68% | -93.13% | -6.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -57.23% | -28.85% | -28.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.23% | -29.05% | -28.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.23% | -29.59% | -27.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -32.12% | -56.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.92% | -8.97% | -33.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -70.86% | -39.60% | -31.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.24% | 13.66% | +15.58% |
Volatility
FTLF vs. CDNS - Volatility Comparison
FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a higher volatility of 21.57% compared to Cadence Design Systems, Inc. (CDNS) at 16.25%. This indicates that FTLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CDNS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FTLF | CDNS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.57% | 16.25% | +5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.25% | 31.63% | +8.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.82% | 39.04% | +14.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.91% | 36.21% | +9.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 305.95% | 34.14% | +271.81% |
Dividends
FTLF vs. CDNS - Dividend Comparison
Neither FTLF nor CDNS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
FTLF vs. CDNS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock and Cadence Design Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FTLF and CDNS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FTLF has higher volatility (21.57%) compared to CDNS (16.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FTLF dropped -99.68% vs CDNS's -93.13%.
CDNS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.75 vs -0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FTLF and CDNS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer