FTLF vs. TSLA

In the year-to-date period, FTLF achieves a -11.29% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -15.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLF has outperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 65.42%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively lower 35.47% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current FTLF Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLF and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither FTLF nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.35%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and TSLA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) have volatilities of 18.14% and 18.06%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock and Tesla, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.