FTLF vs. TSLA

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA).

Performance

FTLF vs. TSLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FTLF vs. TSLA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock	-12.72%	-0.18%	70.68%	19.75%	-0.31%	196.30%	53.19%	3,182.89%	78.96%	-74.74%
TSLA Tesla, Inc.	-17.34%	11.36%	62.52%	101.72%	-65.03%	49.76%	743.44%	25.70%	6.89%	45.70%

Fundamentals

EPS FTLF : $0.68 TSLA : $1.08
PE Ratio FTLF : 20.97 TSLA : 345.69
PEG Ratio FTLF : 2.31 TSLA : 42.29
PS Ratio FTLF : 2.01 TSLA : 13.83
Total Revenue (TTM) FTLF : $70.56M TSLA : $94.83B
Gross Profit (TTM) FTLF : $28.73M TSLA : $17.09B
EBITDA (TTM) FTLF : $11.02M TSLA : $11.76B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FTLF achieves a -12.72% return, which is significantly higher than TSLA's -17.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FTLF has outperformed TSLA with an annualized return of 59.00%, while TSLA has yielded a comparatively lower 37.10% annualized return.

FTLF

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -6.15%
• YTD: -12.72%
• 6M: -28.61%
• 1Y: 17.36%
• 3Y*: 19.24%
• 5Y*: 26.94%
• 10Y*: 59.00%

TSLA

• 1D: 4.64%
• 1M: -7.64%
• YTD: -17.34%
• 6M: -16.41%
• 1Y: 43.44%
• 3Y*: 21.46%
• 5Y*: 11.00%
• 10Y*: 37.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FTLF vs. TSLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FTLF

FTLF Risk / Return Rank: 52
FTLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FTLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FTLF Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FTLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
FTLF Martin Ratio Rank: 50

TSLA

TSLA Risk / Return Rank: 69
TSLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
TSLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
TSLA Omega Ratio Rank: 64
TSLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
TSLA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FTLF vs. TSLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Tesla, Inc. (TSLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FTLF	TSLA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.35	0.79	-0.44
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.92	1.44	-0.52
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.10	1.18	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.32	1.49	-1.17
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.74	3.66	-2.92
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FTLF vs. TSLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FTLF Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the TSLA Sharpe Ratio of 0.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FTLF and TSLA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FTLF	TSLA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35	0.79	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60	0.19	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.19	0.63	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.03	0.72	-0.69

Correlation

The correlation between FTLF and TSLA is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

FTLF vs. TSLA - Dividend Comparison

Neither FTLF nor TSLA has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

FTLF vs. TSLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than TSLA's maximum drawdown of -73.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and TSLA.

Drawdown Indicators

	FTLF	TSLA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.68%	-73.63%	-26.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-38.87%	-27.48%	-11.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.11%	-73.63%	+30.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.06%	-73.63%	-15.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.60%	-24.11%	-7.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-71.11%	-22.77%	-48.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.06%	11.21%	+5.85%

Volatility

FTLF vs. TSLA - Volatility Comparison

FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to Tesla, Inc. (TSLA) at 11.25%. This indicates that FTLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FTLF	TSLA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.35%	11.25%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.04%	29.73%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	50.33%	55.49%	-5.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.31%	59.07%	-13.76%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	305.84%	59.03%	+246.81%

Financials