FTLF vs. NVO
Compare and contrast key facts about FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO).
Performance
FTLF vs. NVO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FTLF vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | -25.63% | -0.18% | 70.68% | 19.75% | -0.31% | 196.30% | 53.19% | 3,182.89% | 78.96% | -74.74% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | -25.80% | -39.22% | -15.93% | 54.84% | 22.66% | 63.52% | 23.33% | 28.70% | -12.98% | 52.92% |
Fundamentals
FTLF:
$0.68
NVO:
$22.15
FTLF:
17.87
NVO:
1.65
FTLF:
1.97
NVO:
0.07
FTLF:
1.71
NVO:
0.55
FTLF:
$70.56M
NVO:
$297.20B
FTLF:
$28.73M
NVO:
$240.66B
FTLF:
$11.02M
NVO:
$153.18B
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FTLF having a -25.63% return and NVO slightly lower at -25.80%. Over the past 10 years, FTLF has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 56.48%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 5.04% annualized return.
FTLF
- 1D
- -14.79%
- 1M
- -19.76%
- YTD
- -25.63%
- 6M
- -38.58%
- 1Y
- 2.11%
- 3Y*
- 13.05%
- 5Y*
- 22.95%
- 10Y*
- 56.48%
NVO
- 1D
- -0.73%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- -25.80%
- 6M
- -36.19%
- 1Y
- -43.88%
- 3Y*
- -20.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- 5.04%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FTLF vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank
FTLF
NVO
FTLF vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FTLF | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.04 | -0.81 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.46 | -0.99 | +1.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.86 | +0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.00 | -0.82 | +0.82 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.00 | -1.41 | +1.41 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FTLF | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 | -0.81 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.10 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 | 0.16 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | 0.46 | -0.43 |
Correlation
The correlation between FTLF and NVO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FTLF vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison
FTLF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.94%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTLF FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NVO Novo Nordisk A/S | 4.94% | 3.31% | 1.68% | 1.00% | 1.20% | 1.35% | 1.87% | 2.14% | 1.45% | 1.52% | 2.87% | 0.92% |
Drawdowns
FTLF vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FTLF drawdown since its inception was -99.68%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FTLF and NVO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FTLF | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.68% | -74.70% | -24.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.71% | -55.03% | +13.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.11% | -74.70% | +31.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.06% | -74.70% | -14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -41.71% | -73.49% | +31.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.10% | -17.56% | -53.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.26% | 31.83% | -14.57% |
Volatility
FTLF vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison
FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock (FTLF) has a higher volatility of 19.97% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 9.39%. This indicates that FTLF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FTLF | NVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.97% | 9.39% | +10.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.15% | 38.79% | -6.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.33% | 54.16% | -1.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.72% | 37.82% | +7.90% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 305.81% | 32.28% | +273.53% |
Financials
FTLF vs. NVO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between FitLife Brands Inc. Common Stock and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities