PWC vs. GRNJ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PWC (Invesco Dynamic Market ETF) and GRNJ (Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds. PWC is passively managed, while GRNJ is actively managed. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWC charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRNJ.

Performance

PWC vs. GRNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWC achieves a 5.85% return, which is significantly lower than GRNJ's 26.11% return.

PWC

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 0.31%
• YTD: 5.85%
• 6M: 6.04%
• 1Y: 8.50%
• 3Y*: 13.71%
• 5Y*: 6.10%
• 10Y*: 9.52%

GRNJ

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 8.92%
• YTD: 26.11%
• 6M: 25.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWC vs. GRNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	5.85%	2.09%
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	26.11%	5.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PWC and GRNJ is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2025	0.52

Return for Risk

PWC vs. GRNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWC

PWC Risk / Return Rank: 25
PWC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
PWC Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PWC Omega Ratio Rank: 22
PWC Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
PWC Martin Ratio Rank: 28

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWC vs. GRNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Market ETF (PWC) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF (GRNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PWC	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.06	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PWC	GRNJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	2.35	-2.24

Drawdowns

PWC vs. GRNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWC drawdown since its inception was -78.13%, which is greater than GRNJ's maximum drawdown of -17.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWC and GRNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWC	GRNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.13%	-17.32%	-60.81%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.45%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.37%	-1.17%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-36.21%	-4.13%	-32.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.10%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWC	GRNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.19%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.75%	29.93%	-20.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.07%	29.93%	-13.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	29.93%	-11.12%

PWC vs. GRNJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than GRNJ's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWC vs. GRNJ - Dividend Comparison

PWC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, while GRNJ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GRNJ Fundstrat Granny Shots US Small- & Mid-Cap ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PWC Invesco Dynamic Market ETF	1.68%	1.77%	1.58%	1.67%	1.51%	0.56%	1.09%	0.95%	1.44%	1.75%	1.35%	1.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWC and GRNJ in my portfolio?

PWC and GRNJ have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PWC or GRNJ?

On fees, PWC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWC or GRNJ?

PWC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRNJ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWC or GRNJ?

PWC has the higher dividend yield at 1.68%, compared with 0.00% for GRNJ.

What is the main difference between PWC and GRNJ?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Fundstrat. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PWC and 0.75% for GRNJ.