PWB vs. XTL
PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PWB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWB returned 18.77%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for XTL. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PWB charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
PWB vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 30.14% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, PWB has outperformed XTL with an annualized return of 18.77%, while XTL has yielded a comparatively lower 16.10% annualized return.
PWB
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- 7.93%
- YTD
- 30.14%
- 6M
- 31.70%
- 1Y
- 48.14%
- 3Y*
- 33.67%
- 5Y*
- 18.60%
- 10Y*
- 18.77%
XTL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 55.42%
- 1Y
- 120.69%
- 3Y*
- 45.66%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
PWB vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 30.14% | 24.94% | 31.04% | 30.61% | -25.81% | 19.58% | 31.89% | 24.68% | 0.88% | 30.71% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.46% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWB and XTL is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PWB and XTL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
PWB vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PWB
XTL
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
Financial Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
PWB
XTL
Industrials
PWB
XTL
-
Communication Services
PWB
XTL
Financial Services
PWB
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
PWB
XTL
-
Consumer Cyclical
PWB
XTL
-
Healthcare
PWB
XTL
-
Utilities
PWB
XTL
-
Basic Materials
PWB
XTL
-
Energy
PWB
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
PWB
-
XTL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWB vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
PWB
XTL
PWB vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWB | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.58 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 8.26 | -4.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.69 | 34.62 | -17.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWB vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWB | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.58% | -37.01% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -14.70% | +2.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.10% | -22.79% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -37.01% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.36% | -37.01% | +4.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -6.61% | +6.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.23% | -9.76% | +1.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.50% | -0.61% |
Volatility
PWB vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is 9.23%, while SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a volatility of 11.24%. This indicates that PWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWB | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.23% | 11.24% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.98% | 24.21% | -7.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.07% | 30.10% | -10.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.28% | 25.35% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.86% | 23.67% | -2.81% |
PWB vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWB vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.04% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWB and XTL have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to PWB (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 18.77% vs 16.10% for XTL. On fees, XTL is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, PWB has been the lower-risk option at 9.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.77% return vs 16.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XTL is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for PWB.
XTL has the higher dividend yield at 0.86%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.
PWB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while XTL is Communications Equities. PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.35% for XTL.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWB and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer