PWB vs. UGA
PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - PWB is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PWB returned 18.61%/yr vs 14.31%/yr for UGA. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PWB charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
PWB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 26.79% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return. Over the past 10 years, PWB has outperformed UGA with an annualized return of 18.61%, while UGA has yielded a comparatively lower 14.31% annualized return.
PWB
- 1D
- -4.36%
- 1M
- 4.17%
- YTD
- 26.79%
- 6M
- 24.81%
- 1Y
- 42.75%
- 3Y*
- 32.92%
- 5Y*
- 17.17%
- 10Y*
- 18.61%
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
PWB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 26.79% | 24.94% | 31.04% | 30.61% | -25.81% | 19.58% | 31.89% | 24.68% | 0.88% | 30.71% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between PWB and UGA is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008 | 0.21 |
The correlation between PWB and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PWB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
PWB
UGA
PWB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PWB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.30 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 3.17 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.75 | 9.39 | +5.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PWB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PWB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.58% | -86.59% | +34.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -18.96% | +6.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.10% | -26.68% | +4.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.41% | -38.11% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.36% | -75.89% | +43.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.36% | -18.05% | +13.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -36.69% | +28.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 6.43% | -3.52% |
Volatility
PWB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) has a higher volatility of 10.34% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that PWB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PWB | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.34% | 9.24% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.43% | 30.57% | -13.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.72% | 35.22% | -14.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.41% | 34.45% | -13.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.91% | 37.22% | -16.31% |
PWB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PWB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
Neither PWB nor UGA has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.37% | 0.31% | 0.04% | 0.21% | 0.58% | 0.97% | 0.54% | 0.82% | 0.67% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PWB and UGA have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PWB has higher volatility (10.34%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PWB dropped -52.58% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 10-year performance, PWB leads with 18.61% vs 14.31% for UGA. On fees, PWB is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PWB has performed better with a 18.61% return vs 14.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PWB is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
PWB and UGA have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PWB is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. PWB tracks Dynamic Large Cap Growth Intellidex Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.75% for UGA.
PWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PWB and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer