PWB vs. SPIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PWB (Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. PWB is passively managed, while SPIT is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PWB charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.

Performance

PWB vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a 24.96% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 27.30% return.

PWB

• 1D: -2.16%
• 1M: -0.81%
• 6M: 19.67%
• YTD: 24.96%
• 1Y: 36.90%
• 3Y*: 30.77%
• 5Y*: 16.41%
• 10Y*: 17.80%

SPIT

• 1D: -1.91%
• 1M: 0.33%
• 6M: 18.89%
• YTD: 27.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PWB vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	24.96%	1.19%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	27.30%	5.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and SPIT is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025	0.81

Return for Risk

PWB vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB

PWB Risk / Return Rank: 68
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SPIT

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PWB	SPIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.69	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.04	—	—

Drawdowns

PWB vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and SPIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PWB	SPIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.58%	-12.49%	-40.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-31.41%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.74%	-5.43%	-0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.21%	-2.51%	-5.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.07%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PWB	SPIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.34%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.88%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.01%	26.39%	-4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.68%	26.39%	-4.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.04%	26.39%	-5.35%

PWB vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

PWB vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PWB Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.08%	0.37%	0.31%	0.04%	0.21%	0.58%	0.97%	0.54%	0.82%	0.67%
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF	5.64%	7.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PWB and SPIT in my portfolio?

PWB and SPIT have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PWB or SPIT?

On fees, PWB is cheaper at 0.56% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PWB or SPIT?

PWB is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PWB or SPIT?

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.64%, compared with 0.00% for PWB.

What is the main difference between PWB and SPIT?

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for PWB and 0.89% for SPIT.