PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PWB vs. DARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PWB vs. DARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PWB vs. DARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
-0.93%24.94%31.04%10.96%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
4.29%40.19%24.63%6.25%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PWB achieves a -0.93% return, which is significantly lower than DARP's 4.29% return.


PWB

1D
3.98%
1M
-7.08%
YTD
-0.93%
6M
0.41%
1Y
31.12%
3Y*
24.82%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
15.44%

DARP

1D
3.09%
1M
-6.88%
YTD
4.29%
6M
13.93%
1Y
64.15%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PWB vs. DARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PWB has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than DARP's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PWB vs. DARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PWB
PWB Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PWB Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
PWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
PWB Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

DARP
DARP Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
DARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
DARP Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
DARP Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PWB vs. DARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) and Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PWBDARPDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.35

2.19

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.92

2.73

-0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.39

-0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.59

3.97

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.04

16.42

-6.38

PWB vs. DARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PWB Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the DARP Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PWB and DARP, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PWBDARPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.35

2.19

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

1.11

-0.56

Correlation

The correlation between PWB and DARP is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PWB vs. DARP - Dividend Comparison

PWB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DARP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PWB
Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF
0.00%0.00%0.08%0.37%0.31%0.04%0.21%0.58%0.97%0.54%0.82%0.67%
DARP
Grizzle Growth ETF
0.42%0.43%1.93%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PWB vs. DARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PWB drawdown since its inception was -52.58%, which is greater than DARP's maximum drawdown of -30.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PWB and DARP.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PWBDARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.58%

-30.27%

-22.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-15.92%

+3.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.61%

-9.09%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-4.84%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

3.85%

-0.73%

Volatility

PWB vs. DARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dynamic Large Cap Growth ETF (PWB) is 7.98%, while Grizzle Growth ETF (DARP) has a volatility of 9.51%. This indicates that PWB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PWBDARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.98%

9.51%

-1.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.16%

19.28%

-4.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.23%

29.51%

-6.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.96%

26.42%

-5.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.58%

26.42%

-5.84%