PVI vs. IPOS

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PVI (Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF) and IPOS (Renaissance International IPO ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PVI is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the ICE US Municipal AMT-Free VRDO Constrained Index, while IPOS is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Renaissance International IPO Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PVI returned 1.31%/yr vs 2.95%/yr for IPOS. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PVI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for IPOS.

Performance

PVI vs. IPOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVI achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than IPOS's 39.55% return. Over the past 10 years, PVI has underperformed IPOS with an annualized return of 1.31%, while IPOS has yielded a comparatively higher 2.95% annualized return.

PVI

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 0.52%
• YTD: 0.68%
• 6M: 1.24%
• 1Y: 2.24%
• 3Y*: 2.62%
• 5Y*: 1.95%
• 10Y*: 1.31%

IPOS

• 1D: 1.59%
• 1M: 10.99%
• YTD: 39.55%
• 6M: 44.16%
• 1Y: 65.91%
• 3Y*: 15.11%
• 5Y*: -7.78%
• 10Y*: 2.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVI vs. IPOS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF	0.68%	3.12%	2.43%	2.74%	0.89%	-0.07%	0.17%	1.18%	1.21%	0.44%
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	39.55%	39.93%	-12.34%	-16.49%	-33.46%	-30.62%	50.71%	30.93%	-22.33%	36.83%

Correlation

The correlation between PVI and IPOS is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.02
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2014	0.01

The correlation between PVI and IPOS shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.01 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PVI vs. IPOS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PVI	IPOS
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	7.1%
Basic Materials	-	5.3%
Communication Services	-	0.3%
Consumer Defensive	-	4.7%
Energy	-	4.9%
Financial Services	-	9.6%
Healthcare	-	16.2%
Industrials	-	15.0%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	42.0%
Utilities	-	3.1%

Return for Risk

PVI vs. IPOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVI

PVI Risk / Return Rank: 32
PVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
PVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PVI Omega Ratio Rank: 25
PVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
PVI Martin Ratio Rank: 44

IPOS

IPOS Risk / Return Rank: 67
IPOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IPOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
IPOS Omega Ratio Rank: 66
IPOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
IPOS Martin Ratio Rank: 65

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVI vs. IPOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) and Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PVI	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.84	2.25	-1.41
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.78	-1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.41	-0.24
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.29	3.96	-1.67
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.40	11.98	-4.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PVI vs. IPOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVI Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the IPOS Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVI and IPOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PVI	IPOS	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84	2.25	-1.41
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	-0.29	+1.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.75	0.12	+0.62
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.09	+0.44

Drawdowns

PVI vs. IPOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVI drawdown since its inception was -4.10%, smaller than the maximum IPOS drawdown of -73.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVI and IPOS.

Drawdown Indicators

	PVI	IPOS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.10%	-73.09%	+68.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.99%	-17.17%	+16.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-1.17%	-34.08%	+32.91%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-1.17%	-69.93%	+68.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-1.17%	-73.09%	+71.92%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-40.70%	+40.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.28%	-31.99%	+31.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.31%	5.67%	-5.36%

Volatility

PVI vs. IPOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) is 0.77%, while Renaissance International IPO ETF (IPOS) has a volatility of 12.06%. This indicates that PVI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IPOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PVI	IPOS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.77%	12.06%	-11.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.84%	26.46%	-24.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.66%	29.42%	-26.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.97%	27.20%	-25.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	1.75%	24.13%	-22.38%

PVI vs. IPOS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than IPOS's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PVI vs. IPOS - Dividend Comparison

PVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, more than IPOS's 0.68% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IPOS Renaissance International IPO ETF	0.68%	1.04%	0.93%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	0.25%	0.89%	1.12%	0.87%	1.73%	1.08%
PVI Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF	2.15%	2.22%	2.72%	3.36%	0.56%	0.00%	0.36%	1.15%	1.14%	0.56%	0.13%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PVI and IPOS in my portfolio?

PVI and IPOS have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PVI or IPOS?

IPOS has higher volatility (12.06%) compared to PVI (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVI dropped -4.10% vs IPOS's -73.09%.

Which ETF is better, PVI or IPOS?

On 10-year performance, IPOS leads with 2.95% vs 1.31% for PVI. On fees, PVI is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PVI has been the lower-risk option at 0.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PVI or IPOS?

Over the 10-year period, IPOS has performed better with a 2.95% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PVI or IPOS?

PVI is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for IPOS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PVI or IPOS?

PVI has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 0.68% for IPOS.

What is the main difference between PVI and IPOS?

PVI is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while IPOS is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PVI tracks ICE US Municipal AMT-Free VRDO Constrained Index, while IPOS tracks Renaissance International IPO Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Renaissance Capital. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PVI and 0.80% for IPOS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IPOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.