PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PVI vs. SUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PVI vs. SUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PVI achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly lower than SUB's 0.78% return. Over the past 10 years, PVI has underperformed SUB with an annualized return of 1.31%, while SUB has yielded a comparatively higher 1.49% annualized return.


PVI

1D
0.36%
1M
0.52%
YTD
0.68%
6M
1.24%
1Y
2.24%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
1.95%
10Y*
1.31%

SUB

1D
0.07%
1M
0.29%
YTD
0.78%
6M
1.19%
1Y
3.21%
3Y*
3.19%
5Y*
1.46%
10Y*
1.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PVI vs. SUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PVI
Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF
0.68%3.12%2.43%2.74%0.89%-0.07%0.17%1.18%1.21%0.44%
SUB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
0.78%3.64%2.17%2.91%-2.05%0.03%2.51%2.93%1.85%0.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PVI and SUB is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2008

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PVI vs. SUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PVI
PVI Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
PVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVI Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
PVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

SUB
SUB Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
SUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUB Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
SUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUB Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PVI vs. SUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) and iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PVISUBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

3.23

-2.38

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.27

4.68

-3.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.72

-0.56

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

3.96

-1.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.40

11.24

-3.85

PVI vs. SUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PVI Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the SUB Sharpe Ratio of 3.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PVI and SUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PVISUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

3.23

-2.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

0.89

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.57

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.42

+0.11

Drawdowns

PVI vs. SUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PVI drawdown since its inception was -4.10%, smaller than the maximum SUB drawdown of -9.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PVI and SUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PVISUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.10%

-9.46%

+5.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.99%

-0.81%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.17%

-1.23%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.17%

-4.35%

+3.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-1.17%

-9.46%

+8.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.12%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.28%

-0.92%

+0.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.31%

0.28%

+0.03%

Volatility

PVI vs. SUB - Volatility Comparison

Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF (PVI) has a higher volatility of 0.77% compared to iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) at 0.28%. This indicates that PVI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SUB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PVISUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.77%

0.28%

+0.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.84%

0.79%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.66%

1.00%

+1.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.97%

1.64%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.75%

2.60%

-0.85%

PVI vs. SUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PVI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SUB's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PVI vs. SUB - Dividend Comparison

PVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than SUB's 2.53% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PVI
Invesco VRDO Tax-Free ETF
2.15%2.22%2.72%3.36%0.56%0.00%0.36%1.15%1.14%0.56%0.13%0.00%
SUB
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF
2.53%2.42%2.10%1.73%0.86%0.72%1.23%1.58%1.32%0.95%0.75%0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


PVI and SUB have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PVI has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to SUB (0.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PVI dropped -4.10% vs SUB's -9.46%.

On 10-year performance, SUB leads with 1.49% vs 1.31% for PVI. On fees, SUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, SUB has been the lower-risk option at 0.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SUB has performed better with a 1.49% return vs 1.31%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PVI.

SUB has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.15% for PVI.

PVI tracks ICE US Municipal AMT-Free VRDO Constrained Index, while SUB tracks ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PVI and 0.07% for SUB.

SUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.23 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PVI and SUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer