PUST.PA vs. URTH
PUST.PA (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc) and URTH (iShares MSCI World ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PUST.PA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while URTH is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA returned 21.21%/yr vs 12.97%/yr for URTH. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PUST.PA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for URTH.
Performance
PUST.PA vs. URTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PUST.PA is traded in EUR, while URTH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the URTH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly higher than URTH's 11.97% return. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA has outperformed URTH with an annualized return of 21.21%, while URTH has yielded a comparatively lower 12.97% annualized return.
PUST.PA
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- 37.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 18.55%
- 10Y*
- 21.21%
URTH
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 5.08%
- YTD
- 11.97%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 24.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.91%
- 5Y*
- 13.01%
- 10Y*
- 12.97%
PUST.PA vs. URTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 20.88% | 5.71% | 35.33% | 50.06% | -29.76% | 38.74% | 36.04% | 40.41% | 4.65% | 16.05% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 11.97% | 6.96% | 26.49% | 20.23% | -12.88% | 31.42% | 6.24% | 31.04% | -4.27% | 7.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUST.PA and URTH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.57 |
The correlation between PUST.PA and URTH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUST.PA vs. URTH — Risk / Return Rank
PUST.PA
URTH
PUST.PA vs. URTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUST.PA | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.39 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 3.74 | -0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 15.35 | -4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUST.PA | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.08 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.85 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | 0.76 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.75 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
PUST.PA vs. URTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum URTH drawdown of -33.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and URTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUST.PA | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.40% | -33.45% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | -6.56% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.80% | -20.94% | -5.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -20.94% | -10.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -33.45% | +2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -0.11% | -0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -4.11% | -1.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 1.59% | +1.86% |
Volatility
PUST.PA vs. URTH - Volatility Comparison
Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) at 2.51%. This indicates that PUST.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than URTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUST.PA | URTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 2.51% | +1.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 8.59% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 11.77% | +3.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 15.37% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 17.21% | +2.53% |
PUST.PA vs. URTH - Expense Ratio Comparison
PUST.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than URTH's 0.24% expense ratio.
Dividends
PUST.PA vs. URTH - Dividend Comparison
PUST.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.34% | 1.48% | 1.47% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.15% | 2.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PUST.PA and URTH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, URTH is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
URTH is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for PUST.PA.
PUST.PA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while URTH is Global Equities. PUST.PA tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while URTH tracks MSCI World Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for PUST.PA and 0.24% for URTH.
Find the right allocation for PUST.PA and URTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer