URTH vs. VT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT).
URTH and VT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. URTH is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Jan 10, 2012. VT is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the FTSE Global All Cap Index. It was launched on Jun 24, 2008. Both URTH and VT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: URTH or VT.
Correlation
The correlation between URTH and VT is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
URTH vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
URTH:
1.80
VT:
1.65
URTH:
2.44
VT:
2.25
URTH:
1.33
VT:
1.30
URTH:
2.61
VT:
2.41
URTH:
11.27
VT:
10.48
URTH:
1.91%
VT:
1.87%
URTH:
11.93%
VT:
11.85%
URTH:
-34.01%
VT:
-50.27%
URTH:
-3.39%
VT:
-3.31%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, URTH achieves a 19.32% return, which is significantly higher than VT's 17.12% return. Over the past 10 years, URTH has outperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.03%, while VT has yielded a comparatively lower 9.28% annualized return.
URTH
19.32%
-0.72%
6.93%
19.85%
11.52%
10.03%
VT
17.12%
-0.90%
6.21%
17.87%
10.16%
9.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
URTH vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
URTH has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
URTH vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
URTH vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
URTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than VT's 1.94% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
URTH iShares MSCI World ETF | 1.47% | 1.70% | 1.68% | 1.50% | 1.52% | 2.16% | 2.30% | 1.88% | 2.14% | 2.35% | 2.32% | 1.04% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.94% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% | 2.44% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
URTH vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum URTH drawdown since its inception was -34.01%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for URTH and VT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
URTH vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World ETF (URTH) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) have volatilities of 3.64% and 3.66%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.