PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE
PUST.PA (Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc) and AMEM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR) are both exchange-traded funds - PUST.PA is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index, while AMEM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA returned 21.21%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for AMEM.DE. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PUST.PA charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for AMEM.DE.
Performance
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PUST.PA achieves a 20.88% return, which is significantly lower than AMEM.DE's 27.34% return. Over the past 10 years, PUST.PA has outperformed AMEM.DE with an annualized return of 21.21%, while AMEM.DE has yielded a comparatively lower 9.86% annualized return.
PUST.PA
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 9.29%
- YTD
- 20.88%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- 37.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.32%
- 5Y*
- 18.55%
- 10Y*
- 21.21%
AMEM.DE
- 1D
- -1.57%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 27.34%
- 6M
- 29.35%
- 1Y
- 49.79%
- 3Y*
- 20.85%
- 5Y*
- 8.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.86%
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PUST.PA Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc | 20.88% | 5.71% | 35.33% | 50.06% | -29.76% | 38.74% | 36.04% | 40.41% | 4.65% | 16.05% |
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR | 27.34% | 19.31% | 13.70% | 5.24% | -13.78% | 3.95% | 6.30% | 21.51% | -11.20% | 20.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between PUST.PA and AMEM.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.63 |
The correlation between PUST.PA and AMEM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (5 years) to 0.69 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
PUST.PA
AMEM.DE
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) and Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PUST.PA | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.51 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.66 | 4.65 | -0.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.77 | 16.89 | -6.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PUST.PA | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 2.80 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 | 0.50 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | 0.54 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.04 | 0.34 | +0.70 |
Drawdowns
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PUST.PA drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum AMEM.DE drawdown of -35.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PUST.PA and AMEM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PUST.PA | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.40% | -35.87% | +4.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.09% | -10.65% | +0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.80% | -19.22% | -7.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.40% | -23.53% | -7.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.40% | -31.93% | +0.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.83% | -2.62% | +1.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.88% | -10.29% | +4.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.45% | 2.94% | +0.51% |
Volatility
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi PEA Nasdaq-100 UCITS ETF Acc (PUST.PA) is 4.31%, while Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that PUST.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PUST.PA | AMEM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.31% | 7.41% | -3.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.86% | 15.02% | -4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.59% | 17.74% | -2.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.81% | 16.70% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.74% | 18.28% | +1.46% |
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PUST.PA has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEM.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PUST.PA vs. AMEM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither PUST.PA nor AMEM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PUST.PA and AMEM.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEM.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for PUST.PA.
PUST.PA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while AMEM.DE is Emerging Markets Equities. PUST.PA tracks NASDAQ-100 Index, while AMEM.DE tracks MSCI Emerging Markets. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for PUST.PA and 0.20% for AMEM.DE.
Find the right allocation for PUST.PA and AMEM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer