AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AMEM.DE (Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR) and EMRGX (Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc.) are both funds - AMEM.DE is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets, while EMRGX is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund managed by T. Rowe Price. Over the past 10 years, AMEM.DE returned 9.86%/yr vs 9.30%/yr for EMRGX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AMEM.DE charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for EMRGX.

Performance

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

AMEM.DE is traded in EUR, while EMRGX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EMRGX values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AMEM.DE achieves a 27.34% return, which is significantly higher than EMRGX's 23.91% return. Over the past 10 years, AMEM.DE has outperformed EMRGX with an annualized return of 9.86%, while EMRGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.30% annualized return.

AMEM.DE

• 1D: -1.57%
• 1M: 5.93%
• YTD: 27.34%
• 6M: 29.35%
• 1Y: 49.79%
• 3Y*: 20.85%
• 5Y*: 8.42%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

EMRGX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 7.67%
• YTD: 23.91%
• 6M: 23.98%
• 1Y: 40.04%
• 3Y*: 15.22%
• 5Y*: 4.63%
• 10Y*: 9.30%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR	27.34%	19.31%	13.70%	5.24%	-13.78%	3.95%	6.30%	21.51%	-11.20%	20.75%
EMRGX Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc.	23.91%	15.94%	7.73%	4.85%	-20.02%	6.69%	11.54%	26.79%	-10.55%	23.94%

Correlation

The correlation between AMEM.DE and EMRGX is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.72
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2014	0.74

The correlation between AMEM.DE and EMRGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AMEM.DE

AMEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 85
AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AMEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AMEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AMEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
AMEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 84

EMRGX

EMRGX Risk / Return Rank: 76
EMRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
EMRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EMRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
EMRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EMRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) and Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AMEM.DE	EMRGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.80	2.67	+0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.73	3.56	+0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.50	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.65	3.82	+0.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.89	13.95	+2.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AMEM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.80, which is comparable to the EMRGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AMEM.DE and EMRGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AMEM.DE	EMRGX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.80	2.67	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50	0.28	+0.21
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.53	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.34	0.35	-0.01

Drawdowns

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AMEM.DE drawdown since its inception was -35.87%, smaller than the maximum EMRGX drawdown of -39.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AMEM.DE and EMRGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	AMEM.DE	EMRGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.87%	-39.35%	+3.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.65%	-10.75%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.22%	-16.69%	-2.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.53%	-31.09%	+7.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.93%	-31.27%	-0.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-0.49%	-2.13%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.29%	-12.83%	+2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.94%	2.93%	+0.01%

Volatility

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Volatility Comparison

Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR (AMEM.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc. (EMRGX) at 5.25%. This indicates that AMEM.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMRGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AMEM.DE	EMRGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.41%	5.25%	+2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.02%	12.16%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.74%	15.41%	+2.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.70%	16.41%	+0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.28%	17.43%	+0.85%

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AMEM.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than EMRGX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

AMEM.DE vs. EMRGX - Dividend Comparison

AMEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
AMEM.DE Amundi MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF EUR	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMRGX Emerging Markets Growth Fund, Inc.	3.24%	3.96%	0.00%	1.51%	1.34%	11.22%	6.63%	5.89%	2.21%	1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AMEM.DE and EMRGX in my portfolio?

AMEM.DE and EMRGX have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.