PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BHF vs. AJG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BHF vs. AJG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BHF achieves a -1.98% return, which is significantly higher than AJG's -16.09% return.


BHF

1D
0.73%
1M
1.66%
YTD
-1.98%
6M
-1.61%
1Y
7.85%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*

AJG

1D
3.20%
1M
5.74%
YTD
-16.09%
6M
-16.06%
1Y
-32.68%
3Y*
1.48%
5Y*
10.13%
10Y*
18.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BHF vs. AJG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
-1.98%34.87%-9.22%3.22%-1.02%43.07%-7.71%28.71%-48.02%-21.81%
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
-16.09%-8.03%27.34%20.51%12.44%39.02%32.12%31.79%19.19%11.24%

Correlation

The correlation between BHF and AJG is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2017

0.38

The correlation between BHF and AJG shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (1 year) to 0.38 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

BHF:

-$1.50

AJG:

$5.74

PS Ratio

BHF:

0.49

AJG:

4.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

BHF:

$5.58B

AJG:

$13.94B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BHF:

$2.23B

AJG:

$7.63B

EBITDA (TTM)

BHF:

$942.00M

AJG:

$3.66B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BHF vs. AJG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BHF
BHF Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
BHF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BHF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BHF Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
BHF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BHF Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

AJG
AJG Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
AJG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AJG Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
AJG Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
AJG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
AJG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BHF vs. AJG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BHFAJGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

0.80

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

-0.81

+1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.88

-1.34

+2.21

BHF vs. AJG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BHF Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is higher than the AJG Sharpe Ratio of -1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BHF and AJG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BHF vs. AJG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BHF drawdown since its inception was -78.47%, which is greater than AJG's maximum drawdown of -57.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BHF and AJG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BHFAJGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.47%

-57.49%

-20.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.62%

-40.64%

+19.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.14%

-44.40%

+13.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.19%

-44.40%

+9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.32%

-37.31%

+21.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-37.33%

-12.85%

-24.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.55%

24.42%

-12.87%

Volatility

BHF vs. AJG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Brighthouse Financial, Inc. (BHF) is 1.78%, while Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (AJG) has a volatility of 8.17%. This indicates that BHF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AJG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BHFAJGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.78%

8.17%

-6.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

22.38%

-15.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

53.74%

28.02%

+25.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.25%

23.03%

+20.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.73%

23.07%

+25.66%

Dividends

BHF vs. AJG - Dividend Comparison

BHF has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AJG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AJG
Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.
1.25%1.00%0.85%0.98%1.08%1.13%1.46%1.81%2.23%2.47%2.93%3.62%
BHF
Brighthouse Financial, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

BHF vs. AJG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20222023202420252026
1.53B
3.63B
(BHF) Total Revenue
(AJG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BHF vs. AJG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Brighthouse Financial, Inc. and Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
39.1%
Portfolio components
BHF - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

AJG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a gross profit of 1.42B and revenue of 3.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.1%.

BHF - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

AJG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported an operating income of 341.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.4%.

BHF - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brighthouse Financial, Inc. reported a net income of -766.00M and revenue of 1.53B, resulting in a net margin of -50.2%.

AJG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. reported a net income of 151.00M and revenue of 3.63B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BHF and AJG have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AJG has higher volatility (8.17%) compared to BHF (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BHF dropped -78.47% vs AJG's -57.49%.

BHF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BHF and AJG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer