PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTMC vs. CSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTMC vs. CSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTMC achieves a 12.33% return, which is significantly lower than CSD's 36.61% return. Over the past 10 years, PTMC has underperformed CSD with an annualized return of 5.91%, while CSD has yielded a comparatively higher 13.73% annualized return.


PTMC

1D
-1.91%
1M
-0.87%
YTD
12.33%
6M
11.93%
1Y
17.22%
3Y*
9.60%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
5.91%

CSD

1D
-2.54%
1M
1.28%
YTD
36.61%
6M
35.22%
1Y
69.23%
3Y*
34.87%
5Y*
15.93%
10Y*
13.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTMC vs. CSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
12.33%-1.55%13.22%7.29%-13.99%12.42%6.58%1.04%0.02%17.79%
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
36.61%21.58%27.61%23.77%-15.04%13.01%10.79%20.61%-17.82%20.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PTMC and CSD is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.69

The correlation between PTMC and CSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (5 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTMC vs. CSD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTMC
CSD

Industrials

23.6%
31.1%

Technology

16.4%
18.6%

Financial Services

15.1%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
2.9%

Healthcare

8.8%
13.1%

Real Estate

7.0%
5.1%

Basic Materials

4.9%
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.8%

-

Energy

4.2%

-

Utilities

3.0%
7.0%

Communication Services

1.4%
9.0%

Industrials

PTMC
23.6%
CSD
31.1%

Technology

PTMC
16.4%
CSD
18.6%

Financial Services

PTMC
15.1%
CSD
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

PTMC
10.8%
CSD
2.9%

Healthcare

PTMC
8.8%
CSD
13.1%

Real Estate

PTMC
7.0%
CSD
5.1%

Basic Materials

PTMC
4.9%
CSD
11.1%

Consumer Defensive

PTMC
4.8%
CSD

-

Energy

PTMC
4.2%
CSD

-

Utilities

PTMC
3.0%
CSD
7.0%

Communication Services

PTMC
1.4%
CSD
9.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTMC vs. CSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTMC
PTMC Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
PTMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTMC Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PTMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTMC Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

CSD
CSD Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
CSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSD Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTMC vs. CSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) and Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTMCCSDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.93

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.47

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

6.14

-4.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.12

24.02

-16.90

PTMC vs. CSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTMC Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the CSD Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTMC and CSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTMCCSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

2.90

-1.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.69

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.55

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.43

+0.07

Drawdowns

PTMC vs. CSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTMC drawdown since its inception was -20.53%, smaller than the maximum CSD drawdown of -70.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTMC and CSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTMCCSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.53%

-70.47%

+49.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.89%

-11.34%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.31%

-30.15%

+14.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.93%

-30.15%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.53%

-57.55%

+37.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.91%

-2.54%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.47%

-14.23%

+7.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.42%

2.89%

-0.47%

Volatility

PTMC vs. CSD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF (PTMC) is 4.36%, while Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF (CSD) has a volatility of 6.10%. This indicates that PTMC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTMCCSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.36%

6.10%

-1.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.59%

18.48%

-6.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.30%

23.98%

-8.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.17%

23.28%

-10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.99%

24.84%

-11.85%

PTMC vs. CSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTMC has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CSD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTMC vs. CSD - Dividend Comparison

PTMC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than CSD's 0.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSD
Invesco S&P Spin-Off ETF
0.12%0.16%0.17%0.51%0.86%0.73%0.99%1.08%0.99%0.60%1.62%2.61%
PTMC
Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap ETF
1.64%1.84%0.87%1.92%0.82%0.12%0.53%1.40%0.89%0.67%0.66%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTMC and CSD have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSD has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to PTMC (4.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTMC dropped -20.53% vs CSD's -70.47%.

On 10-year performance, CSD leads with 13.73% vs 5.91% for PTMC. On fees, PTMC is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTMC has been the lower-risk option at 4.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, CSD has performed better with a 13.73% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTMC is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CSD.

PTMC has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.12% for CSD.

PTMC tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Mid Cap Index, while CSD tracks S&P U.S. Spin-Off Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTMC and 0.65% for CSD.

CSD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.90 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTMC and CSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer