PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIN vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTIN vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly higher than GCOW's 12.18% return.


PTIN

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.96%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.03%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*

GCOW

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.09%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIN vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
16.79%16.17%3.36%16.04%-15.98%12.26%-0.56%6.80%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.18%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%4.67%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIN and GCOW is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019

0.64

The correlation between PTIN and GCOW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

PTIN vs. GCOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTIN
GCOW

Financial Services

26.5%

-

Industrials

17.6%
12.4%

Technology

15.8%
0.9%

Healthcare

8.7%
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
4.6%

Basic Materials

6.1%
7.3%

Energy

5.7%
24.4%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
17.1%

Communication Services

3.2%
14.6%

Utilities

2.6%
4.1%

Real Estate

1.0%

-

Financial Services

PTIN
26.5%
GCOW

-

Industrials

PTIN
17.6%
GCOW
12.4%

Technology

PTIN
15.8%
GCOW
0.9%

Healthcare

PTIN
8.7%
GCOW
14.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PTIN
7.1%
GCOW
4.6%

Basic Materials

PTIN
6.1%
GCOW
7.3%

Energy

PTIN
5.7%
GCOW
24.4%

Consumer Defensive

PTIN
5.7%
GCOW
17.1%

Communication Services

PTIN
3.2%
GCOW
14.6%

Utilities

PTIN
2.6%
GCOW
4.1%

Real Estate

PTIN
1.0%
GCOW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTIN vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIN
PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIN vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTINGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.44

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

5.71

-2.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

15.05

-4.06

PTIN vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIN and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTINGCOWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.52

-0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.92

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.59

-0.07

Drawdowns

PTIN vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTINGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-37.64%

+16.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-4.77%

-6.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-12.35%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-21.48%

+0.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-2.73%

+1.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-5.84%

-1.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.81%

+1.21%

Volatility

PTIN vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) has a higher volatility of 5.75% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 2.85%. This indicates that PTIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTINGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

2.85%

+2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

7.99%

+5.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

10.81%

+5.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

13.49%

+0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

16.20%

-2.30%

PTIN vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTIN vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than GCOW's 4.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.43%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
2.17%2.53%2.67%2.09%0.41%2.38%0.77%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTIN and GCOW have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTIN has higher volatility (5.75%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.34% vs 6.48% for PTIN. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for PTIN.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 2.17% for PTIN.

PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTIN and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer