PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTIN vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTIN achieves a 16.79% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return.


PTIN

1D
-0.77%
1M
6.96%
YTD
16.79%
6M
19.03%
1Y
33.04%
3Y*
13.60%
5Y*
6.48%
10Y*

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
16.79%16.17%3.36%16.04%-15.98%12.26%-0.56%6.80%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%28.14%

Correlation

The correlation between PTIN and TQQQ is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2019

0.56

The correlation between PTIN and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (5 years) to 0.72 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTIN
TQQQ

Financial Services

26.5%
0.2%

Industrials

17.6%
2.8%

Technology

15.8%
53.8%

Healthcare

8.7%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

7.1%
12.3%

Basic Materials

6.1%
1.1%

Energy

5.7%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
7.7%

Communication Services

3.2%
15.8%

Utilities

2.6%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.0%
0.1%

Financial Services

PTIN
26.5%
TQQQ
0.2%

Industrials

PTIN
17.6%
TQQQ
2.8%

Technology

PTIN
15.8%
TQQQ
53.8%

Healthcare

PTIN
8.7%
TQQQ
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PTIN
7.1%
TQQQ
12.3%

Basic Materials

PTIN
6.1%
TQQQ
1.1%

Energy

PTIN
5.7%
TQQQ
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

PTIN
5.7%
TQQQ
7.7%

Communication Services

PTIN
3.2%
TQQQ
15.8%

Utilities

PTIN
2.6%
TQQQ
1.4%

Real Estate

PTIN
1.0%
TQQQ
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTIN vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTIN
PTIN Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PTIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTIN Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PTIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTIN Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTINTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.40

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.75

-0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.99

12.27

-1.28

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTIN and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTINTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.04

2.92

-0.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.43

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.74

-0.22

Drawdowns

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTIN drawdown since its inception was -21.27%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTIN and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTINTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-81.66%

+60.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.55%

-36.97%

+25.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.93%

-58.04%

+44.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.27%

-81.66%

+60.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.76%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-18.52%

+10.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

11.28%

-8.26%

Volatility

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot International ETF (PTIN) is 5.75%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that PTIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTINTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.75%

13.29%

-7.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.85%

36.04%

-22.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.27%

47.60%

-31.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.39%

66.53%

-52.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.90%

65.96%

-52.06%

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTIN has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTIN vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

PTIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PTIN
Pacer Trendpilot International ETF
2.17%2.53%2.67%2.09%0.41%2.38%0.77%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTIN and TQQQ have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to PTIN (5.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTIN dropped -21.27% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

On 5-year performance, TQQQ leads with 28.37% vs 6.48% for PTIN. On fees, PTIN is cheaper at 0.66% per year. On volatility, PTIN has been the lower-risk option at 5.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, TQQQ has performed better with a 28.37% return vs 6.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTIN is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TQQQ.

PTIN has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 0.36% for TQQQ.

PTIN is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while TQQQ is Leveraged Equities. PTIN tracks Pacer Trendpilot International Index, while TQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Pacer and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.66% for PTIN and 0.95% for TQQQ.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTIN and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer