PTH vs. XMVM
PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and XMVM (Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PTH tracks the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index while XMVM tracks the S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PTH returned 14.57%/yr vs 12.11%/yr for XMVM. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for XMVM.
Performance
PTH vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PTH having a 17.14% return and XMVM slightly lower at 16.49%. Over the past 10 years, PTH has outperformed XMVM with an annualized return of 14.57%, while XMVM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.11% annualized return.
PTH
- 1D
- -2.68%
- 1M
- 12.36%
- 6M
- 17.65%
- YTD
- 17.14%
- 1Y
- 56.88%
- 3Y*
- 14.27%
- 5Y*
- 2.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.57%
XMVM
- 1D
- 1.85%
- 1M
- 4.62%
- 6M
- 12.27%
- YTD
- 16.49%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 18.58%
- 5Y*
- 13.33%
- 10Y*
- 12.11%
PTH vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 17.14% | 27.91% | 2.36% | -4.54% | -20.61% | -3.20% | 67.26% | 34.45% | -1.23% | 50.15% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 16.49% | 18.46% | 11.73% | 16.31% | -8.21% | 35.15% | 5.68% | 30.38% | -9.62% | 2.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTH and XMVM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.58 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PTH and XMVM has dropped to 0.34 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PTH vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PTH
XMVM
Healthcare
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
PTH
XMVM
Financial Services
PTH
XMVM
Basic Materials
PTH
-
XMVM
Communication Services
PTH
-
XMVM
Consumer Cyclical
PTH
-
XMVM
Consumer Defensive
PTH
-
XMVM
Energy
PTH
-
XMVM
Industrials
PTH
-
XMVM
Real Estate
PTH
-
XMVM
Technology
PTH
-
XMVM
Utilities
PTH
-
XMVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTH vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank
PTH
XMVM
PTH vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTH | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.77 | 3.66 | +1.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.03 | 11.45 | +0.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTH vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and XMVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTH | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.52% | -62.83% | +9.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.98% | -9.18% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.51% | -24.12% | -3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -50.07% | -24.12% | -25.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.52% | -45.07% | -8.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | 0.00% | -5.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.95% | -10.22% | -6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.74% | 2.93% | +1.81% |
Volatility
PTH vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison
Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) has a higher volatility of 7.37% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.35%. This indicates that PTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTH | XMVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.37% | 3.35% | +4.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.37% | 9.57% | +9.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.34% | 14.83% | +9.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.68% | 21.34% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.33% | 22.73% | +4.60% |
PTH vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
PTH vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison
PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.62%, more than XMVM's 1.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF | 2.62% | 3.07% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XMVM Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF | 1.80% | 2.07% | 1.43% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.10% | 1.37% | 1.73% | 2.87% | 2.22% | 2.27% | 2.58% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PTH and XMVM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTH has higher volatility (7.37%) compared to XMVM (3.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs XMVM's -62.83%.
On 10-year performance, PTH leads with 14.57% vs 12.11% for XMVM. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PTH has performed better with a 14.57% return vs 12.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.
PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.62%, compared with 1.80% for XMVM.
PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.39% for XMVM.
PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.35 vs 2.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTH and XMVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer