PTH vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PTH (Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTH is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PTH returned 0.29%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for QQQM. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PTH charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

PTH vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTH achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 16.48% return.

PTH

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 7.38%
• YTD: 10.66%
• 6M: 8.96%
• 1Y: 47.97%
• 3Y*: 12.29%
• 5Y*: 0.29%
• 10Y*: 14.65%

QQQM

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.99%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTH vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	10.66%	27.91%	2.36%	-4.54%	-20.61%	-3.20%	8.66%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.48%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PTH and QQQM is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.42
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.57

The correlation between PTH and QQQM shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTH vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PTH	QQQM
Healthcare	99.8%	3.7%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	58.7%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

PTH vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTH

PTH Risk / Return Rank: 66
PTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
PTH Omega Ratio Rank: 58
PTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PTH Martin Ratio Rank: 61

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTH vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTH	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.00	1.97	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.58	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.35	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.02	2.94	+1.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.05	10.88	-0.83

PTH vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTH Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTH and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTH vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTH drawdown since its inception was -53.52%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTH and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTH	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.52%	-35.04%	-18.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.98%	-11.96%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.09%	-22.70%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.07%	-35.04%	-15.03%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-53.52%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.70%	-4.24%	-5.46%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.99%	-8.20%	-8.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.79%	3.22%	+1.57%

Volatility

PTH vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF (PTH) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) have volatilities of 9.29% and 9.00%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTH	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.29%	9.00%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.85%	14.43%	+4.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.06%	17.85%	+6.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.57%	22.53%	+3.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.30%	22.30%	+5.00%

PTH vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTH has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTH vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

PTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PTH Invesco DWA Healthcare Momentum ETF	2.78%	3.07%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTH and QQQM in my portfolio?

PTH and QQQM have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTH or QQQM?

PTH has higher volatility (9.29%) compared to QQQM (9.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTH dropped -53.52% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, PTH or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.11% vs 0.29% for PTH. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 9.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTH or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.11% return vs 0.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTH or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTH or QQQM?

PTH has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.44% for QQQM.

What is the main difference between PTH and QQQM?

PTH is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PTH tracks Dorsey Wright Healthcare Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTH and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.