PTEN vs. PR
PTEN (Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.) and PR (Permian Resources Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — PTEN in Oil & Gas Drilling, PR in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 3 years, PTEN returned -9.15%/yr vs 27.77%/yr for PR. Their 0.66 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
PTEN vs. PR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PTEN achieves a 75.12% return, which is significantly higher than PR's 54.47% return.
PTEN
- 1D
- 6.40%
- 1M
- 21.02%
- 6M
- 42.10%
- YTD
- 75.12%
- 1Y
- 98.57%
- 3Y*
- -9.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.68%
- 10Y*
- -3.71%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.97%
PR
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- 17.09%
- 6M
- 34.36%
- YTD
- 54.47%
- 1Y
- 62.33%
- 3Y*
- 27.77%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 33.19%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $175.90M | $166.83M | $210.51M | |
| $105.98M | $91.96M | $96.14M |
PTEN vs. PR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | 75.12% | -22.08% | -20.99% | -34.18% | 13.54% |
PR Permian Resources Corporation | 54.47% | 1.89% | 11.66% | 49.42% | 16.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PTEN and PR is 0.64, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2022 | 0.66 |
The correlation between PTEN and PR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
PTEN:
$3.98B
PR:
$17.84B
PTEN:
-$0.24
PR:
$0.84
PTEN:
0.85
PR:
4.45
PTEN:
1.28
PR:
1.56
PTEN:
$4.67B
PR:
$3.69B
PTEN:
$114.50M
PR:
$1.20B
PTEN:
$765.51M
PR:
$3.15B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PTEN vs. PR — Risk / Return Rank
PTEN
PR
PTEN vs. PR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) and Permian Resources Corporation (PR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PTEN | PR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.27 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.64 | 2.88 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.08 | 6.95 | +1.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PTEN vs. PR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PTEN drawdown since its inception was -95.13%, which is greater than PR's maximum drawdown of -39.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEN and PR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PTEN | PR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.13% | -39.39% | -55.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.79% | -19.70% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.60% | -39.39% | -25.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -70.93% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -64.51% | -4.57% | -59.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -12.51% | -29.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.85% | 8.25% | +2.60% |
Volatility
PTEN vs. PR - Volatility Comparison
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) has a higher volatility of 17.21% compared to Permian Resources Corporation (PR) at 10.63%. This indicates that PTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PTEN | PR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.21% | 10.63% | +6.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.57% | 24.30% | +14.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.85% | 33.86% | +16.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.08% | 42.06% | +13.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 62.35% | 42.06% | +20.29% |
Dividends
PTEN vs. PR - Dividend Comparison
PTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than PR's 2.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PR Permian Resources Corporation | 2.91% | 4.28% | 5.91% | 2.72% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTEN Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. | 3.44% | 5.24% | 3.87% | 2.96% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.90% | 1.52% | 1.35% | 0.35% | 0.59% | 2.65% |
Financials
PTEN vs. PR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. and Permian Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PTEN and PR have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PTEN has higher volatility (17.21%) compared to PR (10.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEN dropped -95.13% vs PR's -39.39%.
PTEN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PTEN and PR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer