PTEN vs. QQQ

In the year-to-date period, PTEN achieves a -32.52% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 1.69% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEN has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of -10.93%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 17.69% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PTEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEN and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, more than QQQ's 0.58% yield.

The maximum PTEN drawdown since its inception was -95.13%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEN and QQQ.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) has a higher volatility of 14.33% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 5.62%. This indicates that PTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.