PTEN vs. FSLR

In the year-to-date period, PTEN achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than FSLR's -7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEN has underperformed FSLR with an annualized return of -5.25%, while FSLR has yielded a comparatively higher 12.80% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) and First Solar, Inc. (FSLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PTEN Sharpe Ratio is -0.22, which is lower than the FSLR Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEN and FSLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PTEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, while FSLR has not paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum PTEN drawdown since its inception was -95.13%, roughly equal to the maximum FSLR drawdown of -96.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEN and FSLR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. (PTEN) has a higher volatility of 12.56% compared to First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) at 11.75%. This indicates that PTEN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. and First Solar, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.