PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTBD vs. GCOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTBD vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTBD achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 14.53% return.


PTBD

1D
0.53%
1M
0.15%
6M
1.17%
YTD
1.72%
1Y
2.50%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
-1.64%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
0.90%

GCOW

1D
0.00%
1M
5.25%
6M
5.40%
YTD
14.53%
1Y
26.76%
3Y*
16.49%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
9.81%
ALL TIME*
10.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.92M$12.70M$12.24M
$204.54K$249.92K$355.58K

PTBD vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
1.72%2.49%4.24%8.84%-20.88%0.47%10.62%2.16%
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
14.53%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%5.26%

Correlation

The correlation between PTBD and GCOW is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2019

0.32

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTBD vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PTBD
PTBD Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
PTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PTBD vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PTBDGCOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.44

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.80

3.43

-2.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.99

10.60

-7.61

PTBD vs. GCOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.66, which is lower than the GCOW Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTBD and GCOW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PTBD vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTBD drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, smaller than the maximum GCOW drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTBD and GCOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTBDGCOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.00%

-37.64%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.12%

-7.83%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

-12.35%

+8.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.68%

-21.48%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.21%

-0.94%

-7.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.13%

-5.81%

-4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.84%

2.53%

-1.69%

Volatility

PTBD vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) is 0.94%, while Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) has a volatility of 2.95%. This indicates that PTBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTBDGCOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.94%

2.95%

-2.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.02%

8.54%

-5.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.83%

10.88%

-7.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.26%

13.54%

-6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.73%

16.01%

-8.28%

PTBD vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PTBD and GCOW have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Dividends

PTBD vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison

PTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than GCOW's 4.59% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.59%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%
PTBD
Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF
5.88%5.62%6.56%6.55%6.14%2.70%2.50%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTBD and GCOW have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GCOW has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to PTBD (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTBD dropped -26.00% vs GCOW's -37.64%.

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 13.23% vs -1.64% for PTBD. Both ETFs have the same 0.60% expense ratio. On volatility, PTBD has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 13.23% return vs -1.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PTBD and GCOW have the same expense ratio: 0.60% per year.

PTBD has the higher dividend yield at 5.88%, compared with 4.59% for GCOW.

PTBD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while GCOW is Large Cap Value Equities. PTBD tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index, while GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTBD and GCOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer