PTBD vs. XTR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

PTBD (Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF) and XTR (Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PTBD is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index, while XTR is a Equity Hedged fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PTBD returned 5.44%/yr vs 17.03%/yr for XTR. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PTBD charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XTR.

Performance

PTBD vs. XTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTBD achieves a 1.32% return, which is significantly lower than XTR's 6.30% return.

PTBD

• 1D: -0.01%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 1.32%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 3.66%
• 3Y*: 5.44%
• 5Y*: -1.59%
• 10Y*: —

XTR

• 1D: -1.06%
• 1M: -1.03%
• YTD: 6.30%
• 6M: 5.43%
• 1Y: 19.25%
• 3Y*: 17.03%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTBD vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PTBD Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF	1.32%	2.49%	4.24%	8.84%	-20.88%	-0.63%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	6.30%	13.66%	21.85%	21.16%	-17.67%	4.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PTBD and XTR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2021	0.49

The correlation between PTBD and XTR shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PTBD vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTBD

PTBD Risk / Return Rank: 27
PTBD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
PTBD Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
PTBD Omega Ratio Rank: 26
PTBD Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
PTBD Martin Ratio Rank: 32

XTR

XTR Risk / Return Rank: 52
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 50
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTBD vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PTBD	XTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	1.70	-0.74
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.41	2.36	-0.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.30	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.18	2.27	-1.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.45	9.38	-4.93

PTBD vs. XTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTBD Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the XTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTBD and XTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PTBD vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTBD drawdown since its inception was -26.00%, which is greater than XTR's maximum drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTBD and XTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PTBD	XTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.00%	-20.83%	-5.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.12%	-8.51%	+5.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.82%	-14.35%	+10.53%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.58%	-2.81%	-5.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.15%	-5.90%	-4.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	2.06%	-1.24%

Volatility

PTBD vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF (PTBD) is 1.25%, while Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that PTBD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PTBD	XTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.25%	4.66%	-3.41%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.95%	9.03%	-6.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84%	11.40%	-7.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.27%	13.85%	-6.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.79%	13.85%	-6.06%

PTBD vs. XTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTBD has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XTR's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

PTBD vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison

PTBD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than XTR's 16.77% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
PTBD Pacer Trendpilot US Bond ETF	5.85%	5.62%	6.56%	6.55%	6.14%	2.70%	2.50%	0.62%
XTR Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF	16.77%	17.82%	20.89%	1.09%	1.08%	2.32%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PTBD and XTR in my portfolio?

PTBD and XTR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PTBD or XTR?

XTR has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to PTBD (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTBD dropped -26.00% vs XTR's -20.83%.

Which ETF is better, PTBD or XTR?

On 3-year performance, XTR leads with 17.03% vs 5.44% for PTBD. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, PTBD has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PTBD or XTR?

Over the 3-year period, XTR has performed better with a 17.03% return vs 5.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PTBD or XTR?

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PTBD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PTBD or XTR?

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.77%, compared with 5.85% for PTBD.

What is the main difference between PTBD and XTR?

PTBD is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while XTR is Equity Hedged. PTBD tracks Pacer Trendpilot US Bond Index, while XTR tracks Cboe S&P 500 Tail Risk Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PTBD and 0.25% for XTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.