PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSWD vs. HACK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSWD vs. HACK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSWD achieves a 26.31% return, which is significantly lower than HACK's 32.87% return.


PSWD

1D
1.28%
1M
-1.30%
6M
26.74%
YTD
26.31%
1Y
20.73%
3Y*
17.15%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
18.24%

HACK

1D
1.20%
1M
-0.17%
6M
38.24%
YTD
32.87%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
26.69%
5Y*
11.45%
10Y*
15.86%
ALL TIME*
13.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.39M$24.21M$17.68M
$62.12K$66.88K$71.33K

PSWD vs. HACK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
26.31%1.69%9.46%18.58%
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
32.87%7.97%23.49%20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PSWD and HACK is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023

0.90

The correlation between PSWD and HACK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSWD vs. HACK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSWD
HACK

Technology

98.1%
89.7%

Industrials

1.1%
9.9%

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Communication Services

0.1%

-

Financial Services

0.1%
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

0.1%

-

Healthcare

0.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Energy

0.0%

-

Utilities

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Technology

PSWD
98.1%
HACK
89.7%

Industrials

PSWD
1.1%
HACK
9.9%

Real Estate

PSWD
0.4%
HACK

-

Communication Services

PSWD
0.1%
HACK

-

Financial Services

PSWD
0.1%
HACK
0.3%

Consumer Cyclical

PSWD
0.1%
HACK

-

Healthcare

PSWD
0.1%
HACK

-

Consumer Defensive

PSWD
0.0%
HACK

-

Energy

PSWD
0.0%
HACK

-

Utilities

PSWD
0.0%
HACK

-

Basic Materials

PSWD
0.0%
HACK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSWD vs. HACK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSWD
PSWD Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PSWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSWD Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
PSWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSWD Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

HACK
HACK Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
HACK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HACK Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
HACK Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
HACK Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HACK Martin Ratio Rank: 3232
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSWD vs. HACK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSWDHACKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.18

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

1.26

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.78

2.95

-1.17

PSWD vs. HACK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSWD Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is comparable to the HACK Sharpe Ratio of 0.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSWD and HACK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSWD vs. HACK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSWD drawdown since its inception was -23.70%, smaller than the maximum HACK drawdown of -42.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSWD and HACK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSWDHACKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.70%

-42.68%

+18.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.70%

-20.67%

-3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.70%

-21.90%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.86%

-6.56%

-0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.43%

-11.55%

+5.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.55%

8.81%

+1.74%

Volatility

PSWD vs. HACK - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF (PSWD) and Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) have volatilities of 8.88% and 8.88%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSWDHACKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.88%

8.88%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.02%

23.39%

-0.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.31%

27.37%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.05%

24.64%

-0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.05%

23.36%

+0.69%

PSWD vs. HACK - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSWD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than HACK's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSWD vs. HACK - Dividend Comparison

PSWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.62%, more than HACK's 0.06% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
HACK
Amplify Cybersecurity ETF
0.06%0.07%0.14%0.20%0.24%0.26%1.11%0.14%0.09%0.01%1.23%
PSWD
Xtrackers Cybersecurity Select Equity ETF
0.62%0.88%1.49%0.55%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PSWD and HACK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

HACK has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to PSWD (8.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSWD dropped -23.70% vs HACK's -42.68%.

On 3-year performance, HACK leads with 26.69% vs 17.15% for PSWD. On fees, PSWD is cheaper at 0.20% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, HACK has performed better with a 26.69% return vs 17.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSWD is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for HACK.

PSWD has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.06% for HACK.

PSWD tracks Solactive Cyber Security ESG Screened Index, while HACK tracks Nasdaq ISE Cyber Security Select Index. They also come from different issuers: Xtrackers and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for PSWD and 0.60% for HACK.

HACK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.95 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSWD and HACK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer