PSQ vs. TSLZ
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and TSLZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. PSQ is passively managed, while TSLZ is actively managed. Over the past year, PSQ returned -26.29% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for TSLZ.
Performance
PSQ vs. TSLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than TSLZ's -5.69% return.
PSQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -14.96%
- 1Y
- -26.29%
- 3Y*
- -18.98%
- 5Y*
- -14.55%
- 10Y*
- -19.23%
TSLZ
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -17.84%
- YTD
- -5.69%
- 6M
- -9.62%
- 1Y
- -64.19%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSQ vs. TSLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -16.45% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -11.11% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | -5.69% | -75.98% | -88.79% | -28.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and TSLZ is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 20, 2023 | 0.58 |
The correlation between PSQ and TSLZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. TSLZ — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
TSLZ
PSQ vs. TSLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSQ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.90 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.84 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.12 | -1.06 | -1.06 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSQ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.65 | -0.70 | -0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | -0.67 | -0.09 |
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. TSLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, roughly equal to the maximum TSLZ drawdown of -99.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and TSLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -99.11% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.93% | -76.62% | +49.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.25% | -99.01% | +0.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.97% | -75.36% | +1.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 60.60% | -48.19% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. TSLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 4.50%, while T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLZ) has a volatility of 24.09%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | TSLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 24.09% | -19.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 54.94% | -42.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 91.64% | -75.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 117.04% | -94.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 117.04% | -94.79% |
PSQ vs. TSLZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TSLZ's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSQ vs. TSLZ - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, more than TSLZ's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.24% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
TSLZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Tesla Daily Target ETF | 0.73% | 0.69% | 2.08% | 12.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQ and TSLZ have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TSLZ has higher volatility (24.09%) compared to PSQ (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs TSLZ's -99.11%.
On 1-year performance, PSQ leads with -26.29% vs -64.19% for TSLZ. On fees, PSQ is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, PSQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSQ has performed better with a -26.29% return vs -64.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSQ is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.05% for TSLZ.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.73% for TSLZ.
They also come from different issuers: ProShares and T-Rex. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 1.05% for TSLZ.
TSLZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.70 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and TSLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer