PSQ vs. QYLG

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and QYLG (Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSQ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while QYLG is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSQ returned -12.57%/yr vs 11.80%/yr for QYLG. At a correlation of -0.96, they often move in opposite directions. PSQ charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLG.

Performance

PSQ vs. QYLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -12.26% return, which is significantly lower than QYLG's 11.95% return.

PSQ

• 1D: 1.67%
• 1M: 3.38%
• 6M: -11.38%
• YTD: -12.26%
• 1Y: -18.69%
• 3Y*: -15.73%
• 5Y*: -12.57%
• 10Y*: -18.59%

QYLG

• 1D: -1.62%
• 1M: -1.59%
• 6M: 10.67%
• YTD: 11.95%
• 1Y: 24.48%
• 3Y*: 18.25%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSQ vs. QYLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ	-12.26%	-15.51%	-15.68%	-32.01%	36.40%	-24.84%	-16.46%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	11.95%	15.29%	22.02%	38.73%	-26.27%	18.29%	13.88%

Correlation

The correlation between PSQ and QYLG is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.97
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2020	-0.96

The correlation between PSQ and QYLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSQ vs. QYLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSQ	QYLG
Financial Services	83.3%	0.2%
Basic Materials	-	1.0%
Communication Services	-	14.3%
Consumer Cyclical	-	11.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	6.4%
Energy	-	0.5%
Healthcare	-	3.7%
Industrials	-	2.6%
Real Estate	-	0.1%
Technology	-	58.7%
Utilities	-	1.2%

Return for Risk

PSQ vs. QYLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSQ

PSQ Risk / Return Rank: 2
PSQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PSQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
PSQ Omega Ratio Rank: 2
PSQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
PSQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1

QYLG

QYLG Risk / Return Rank: 69
QYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
QYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
QYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSQ vs. QYLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSQ	QYLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.00	1.71	-2.71
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.44	2.35	-3.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.84	1.31	-0.46
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.76	2.92	-3.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	12.24	-13.79

PSQ vs. QYLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSQ Sharpe Ratio is -1.00, which is lower than the QYLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSQ and QYLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSQ vs. QYLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than QYLG's maximum drawdown of -29.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and QYLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSQ	QYLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-98.26%	-29.98%	-68.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.83%	-8.42%	-16.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-49.65%	-20.75%	-28.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-60.91%	-29.98%	-30.93%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-87.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-98.16%	-3.31%	-94.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-74.10%	-6.33%	-67.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.11%	2.00%	+10.11%

Volatility

PSQ vs. QYLG - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) at 6.28%. This indicates that PSQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QYLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSQ	QYLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.47%	6.28%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.43%	12.34%	+3.09%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	14.40%	+4.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.84%	18.31%	+4.53%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.40%	18.06%	+4.34%

PSQ vs. QYLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSQ has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLG's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSQ vs. QYLG - Dividend Comparison

PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.37%, less than QYLG's 16.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ	4.37%	4.97%	7.15%	6.01%	0.35%	0.00%	0.31%	1.75%	0.95%	0.02%
QYLG Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF	16.75%	17.93%	25.27%	5.43%	6.91%	10.15%	1.44%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSQ and QYLG in my portfolio?

PSQ and QYLG have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSQ or QYLG?

PSQ has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to QYLG (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs QYLG's -29.98%.

Which ETF is better, PSQ or QYLG?

On 5-year performance, QYLG leads with 11.80% vs -12.57% for PSQ. On fees, QYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, QYLG has been the lower-risk option at 6.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSQ or QYLG?

Over the 5-year period, QYLG has performed better with a 11.80% return vs -12.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSQ or QYLG?

QYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for PSQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSQ or QYLG?

QYLG has the higher dividend yield at 16.75%, compared with 4.37% for PSQ.

What is the main difference between PSQ and QYLG?

PSQ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QYLG is Nasdaq-100. PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while QYLG tracks CBOE Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite V2 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for PSQ and 0.60% for QYLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QYLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.