QYLG vs. QQQX

In the year-to-date period, QYLG achieves a -7.35% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's -10.72% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QYLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.41, which is comparable to the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QYLG and QQQX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 28.30%, more than QQQX's 8.31% yield.

The maximum QYLG drawdown since its inception was -29.98%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QYLG and QQQX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call & Growth ETF (QYLG) is 14.89%, while Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 16.15%. This indicates that QYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.