PSQ vs. CARD
PSQ (ProShares Short QQQ) and CARD (Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) are both Inverse Equities funds - PSQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%) while CARD tracks the Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PSQ returned -26.29% vs -35.78% for CARD. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
PSQ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQ achieves a -16.45% return, which is significantly lower than CARD's -2.60% return.
PSQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- -9.35%
- YTD
- -16.45%
- 6M
- -14.96%
- 1Y
- -26.29%
- 3Y*
- -18.98%
- 5Y*
- -14.55%
- 10Y*
- -19.23%
CARD
- 1D
- 1.10%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- YTD
- -2.60%
- 6M
- -2.07%
- 1Y
- -35.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSQ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | -16.45% | -15.51% | -15.68% | -8.48% |
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -2.60% | -60.21% | -58.19% | -30.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQ and CARD is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023 | 0.59 |
The correlation between PSQ and CARD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank
PSQ
CARD
PSQ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.74 | 0.95 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | -0.72 | -0.26 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.12 | -1.06 | -1.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.65 | -0.52 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.87 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.76 | -0.65 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
PSQ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQ drawdown since its inception was -98.26%, which is greater than CARD's maximum drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQ and CARD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.26% | -93.51% | -4.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.93% | -49.57% | +22.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -60.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.25% | -92.68% | -5.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.97% | -68.13% | -5.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.41% | 33.93% | -21.52% |
Volatility
PSQ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ) is 4.50%, while Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD) has a volatility of 22.80%. This indicates that PSQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQ | CARD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.50% | 22.80% | -18.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.14% | 50.05% | -37.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.01% | 68.70% | -52.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.43% | 80.53% | -58.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.25% | 80.53% | -58.28% |
PSQ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSQ and CARD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
PSQ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison
PSQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.24%, while CARD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARD Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSQ ProShares Short QQQ | 5.24% | 4.97% | 7.15% | 6.01% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.31% | 1.75% | 0.95% | 0.02% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQ and CARD have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARD has higher volatility (22.80%) compared to PSQ (4.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSQ dropped -98.26% vs CARD's -93.51%.
On 1-year performance, PSQ leads with -26.29% vs -35.78% for CARD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, PSQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSQ has performed better with a -26.29% return vs -35.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSQ and CARD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
PSQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.24%, compared with 0.00% for CARD.
PSQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-100%), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Max.
CARD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.52 vs -1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSQ and CARD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer