PSMR vs. ICOW
PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) and ICOW (Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSMR is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while ICOW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. PSMR is actively managed, while ICOW is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSMR returned 8.52%/yr vs 10.06%/yr for ICOW. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMR charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ICOW.
Performance
PSMR vs. ICOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.68% return, which is significantly lower than ICOW's 17.35% return.
PSMR
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 7.68%
- 6M
- 8.38%
- 1Y
- 14.83%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 8.52%
- 10Y*
- —
ICOW
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 17.35%
- 6M
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 39.15%
- 3Y*
- 20.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- —
PSMR vs. ICOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.68% | 6.74% | 11.99% | 16.85% | -4.11% | 7.37% |
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 17.35% | 36.95% | -2.59% | 18.94% | -7.98% | 1.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMR and ICOW is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PSMR and ICOW shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSMR vs. ICOW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSMR
ICOW
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
Technology
PSMR
ICOW
Financial Services
PSMR
ICOW
-
Communication Services
PSMR
ICOW
Consumer Cyclical
PSMR
ICOW
Healthcare
PSMR
ICOW
Industrials
PSMR
ICOW
Consumer Defensive
PSMR
ICOW
Energy
PSMR
ICOW
Utilities
PSMR
ICOW
-
Real Estate
PSMR
ICOW
-
Basic Materials
PSMR
ICOW
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMR vs. ICOW — Risk / Return Rank
PSMR
ICOW
PSMR vs. ICOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMR | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.96 | 1.50 | +0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.03 | 4.91 | +10.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 73.58 | 17.54 | +56.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMR | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.23 | 2.87 | +1.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.01 | 0.61 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.55 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
PSMR vs. ICOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, smaller than the maximum ICOW drawdown of -43.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and ICOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMR | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -43.49% | +31.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | -8.02% | +7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | -14.81% | +3.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | -28.48% | +16.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.64% | +0.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -7.59% | +5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | 2.24% | -2.04% |
Volatility
PSMR vs. ICOW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) is 0.71%, while Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) has a volatility of 4.41%. This indicates that PSMR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMR | ICOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 4.41% | -3.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 10.59% | -8.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53% | 13.73% | -10.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 16.64% | -8.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.41% | 18.47% | -10.06% |
PSMR vs. ICOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than ICOW's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMR vs. ICOW - Dividend Comparison
PSMR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ICOW Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF | 2.12% | 3.03% | 4.39% | 3.61% | 5.26% | 2.11% | 2.46% | 3.10% | 2.61% | 0.80% |
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMR and ICOW have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ICOW has higher volatility (4.41%) compared to PSMR (0.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMR dropped -11.78% vs ICOW's -43.49%.
On 5-year performance, ICOW leads with 10.06% vs 8.52% for PSMR. On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSMR has been the lower-risk option at 0.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ICOW has performed better with a 10.06% return vs 8.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ICOW.
ICOW has the higher dividend yield at 2.12%, compared with 0.00% for PSMR.
PSMR is categorized as Defined Outcome, while ICOW is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.65% for ICOW.
PSMR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.23 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSMR and ICOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer