PSMR vs. AIOO
PSMR (Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSMR charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.
Performance
PSMR vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSMR achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.48% return.
PSMR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 1.44%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.91%
- 1Y
- 15.34%
- 3Y*
- 11.77%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- —
AIOO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- 1.11%
- YTD
- 2.48%
- 6M
- 2.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSMR vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSMR Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF | 7.85% | 4.88% |
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 2.48% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSMR and AIOO is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSMR vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank
PSMR
AIOO
PSMR vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (April) ETF (PSMR) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSMR | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.37 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 7.54 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.00 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.97 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 78.35 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSMR | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.06 | 2.88 | -1.82 |
Drawdowns
PSMR vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSMR drawdown since its inception was -11.78%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMR and AIOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSMR | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.78% | -0.74% | -11.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.99% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.78% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -0.17% | -1.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.20% | — | — |
Volatility
PSMR vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSMR | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.75% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54% | 1.98% | +1.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.48% | 1.98% | +6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.42% | 1.98% | +6.44% |
PSMR vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSMR has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSMR vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison
Neither PSMR nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PSMR and AIOO have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSMR is cheaper at 0.61% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSMR is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for AIOO.
PSMR and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSMR and 0.64% for AIOO.
Find the right allocation for PSMR and AIOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer