PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMJ vs. QDPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSMJ vs. QDPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSMJ vs. QDPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
-1.16%13.29%14.06%19.80%-2.41%3.31%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
-4.29%16.52%22.83%23.66%-16.25%8.32%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a -1.16% return, which is significantly higher than QDPL's -4.29% return.


PSMJ

1D
1.57%
1M
-1.88%
YTD
-1.16%
6M
0.87%
1Y
14.41%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
10Y*

QDPL

1D
2.81%
1M
-4.61%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-1.77%
1Y
15.55%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSMJ vs. QDPL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than QDPL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSMJ vs. QDPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMJ
PSMJ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PSMJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMJ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMJ Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

QDPL
QDPL Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
QDPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDPL Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
QDPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDPL Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMJ vs. QDPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMJQDPLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

0.87

+0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

1.34

+0.81

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.20

+0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.37

+0.63

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.57

6.60

+4.96

PSMJ vs. QDPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is higher than the QDPL Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMJ and QDPL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSMJQDPLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

0.87

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

0.63

+0.43

Correlation

The correlation between PSMJ and QDPL is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PSMJ vs. QDPL - Dividend Comparison

PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QDPL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.13%.


TTM20252024202320222021
PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%
QDPL
Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF
5.13%4.84%5.43%6.30%7.27%2.44%

Drawdowns

PSMJ vs. QDPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -10.87%, smaller than the maximum QDPL drawdown of -22.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and QDPL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMJQDPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.87%

-22.59%

+11.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.31%

-11.94%

+4.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-6.08%

+3.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.41%

-5.30%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

2.48%

-1.21%

Volatility

PSMJ vs. QDPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 2.92%, while Pacer Metaurus US Large Cap Dividend Multiplier 400 ETF (QDPL) has a volatility of 5.30%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSMJQDPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

5.30%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.13%

9.39%

-5.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.19%

18.01%

-7.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.09%

15.12%

-6.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.09%

15.12%

-6.03%