PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
PSMJ vs. XLG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


PSMJXLG
YTD Return14.32%32.48%
1Y Return20.38%40.35%
3Y Return (Ann)10.50%12.35%
Sharpe Ratio3.362.90
Sortino Ratio4.693.75
Omega Ratio1.711.53
Calmar Ratio4.683.78
Martin Ratio26.4515.75
Ulcer Index0.82%2.72%
Daily Std Dev6.37%14.71%
Max Drawdown-8.40%-52.39%
Current Drawdown-0.12%-0.30%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.9

The correlation between PSMJ and XLG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

PSMJ vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, PSMJ achieves a 14.32% return, which is significantly lower than XLG's 32.48% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.61%
17.83%
PSMJ
XLG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSMJ vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMJ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio.


PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
Expense ratio chart for PSMJ: current value at 0.75% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.75%
Expense ratio chart for XLG: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PSMJ vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) and Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMJ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PSMJ, currently valued at 3.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.003.36
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PSMJ, currently valued at 4.69, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.004.69
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PSMJ, currently valued at 1.71, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.71
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PSMJ, currently valued at 4.68, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.004.68
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PSMJ, currently valued at 26.45, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0026.45
XLG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for XLG, currently valued at 2.90, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.90
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for XLG, currently valued at 3.75, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.75
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for XLG, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.53
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for XLG, currently valued at 3.78, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.003.78
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for XLG, currently valued at 15.75, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00120.0015.75

PSMJ vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMJ Sharpe Ratio is 3.36, which is comparable to the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 2.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMJ and XLG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.36
2.90
PSMJ
XLG

Dividends

PSMJ vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

PSMJ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
PSMJ
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF
0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%1.97%1.97%

Drawdowns

PSMJ vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMJ drawdown since its inception was -8.40%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMJ and XLG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.12%
-0.30%
PSMJ
XLG

Volatility

PSMJ vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (July) ETF (PSMJ) is 2.03%, while Invesco S&P 500® Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a volatility of 4.69%. This indicates that PSMJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.03%
4.69%
PSMJ
XLG