PSL vs. JMOM
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and JMOM (JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF) are both Momentum funds - PSL tracks the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index while JMOM tracks the JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSL returned 6.05%/yr vs 13.81%/yr for JMOM. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JMOM.
Performance
PSL vs. JMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 14.41% return, which is significantly lower than JMOM's 20.54% return.
PSL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.23%
- 6M
- 4.39%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 1Y
- 6.53%
- 3Y*
- 10.58%
- 5Y*
- 6.05%
- 10Y*
- 8.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.36%
JMOM
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- 6M
- 16.11%
- YTD
- 20.54%
- 1Y
- 29.18%
- 3Y*
- 25.54%
- 5Y*
- 13.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.83%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $17.82M | $11.76M | $9.25M | |
| $139.56K | $200.24K | $192.10K |
PSL vs. JMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 14.41% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 5.83% |
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 20.54% | 18.02% | 28.47% | 22.89% | -20.83% | 25.03% | 29.25% | 28.24% | -5.25% | 3.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and JMOM is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2017 | 0.60 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and JMOM has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. JMOM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
JMOM
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
JMOM
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
JMOM
Financial Services
PSL
JMOM
Industrials
PSL
JMOM
Basic Materials
PSL
-
JMOM
Communication Services
PSL
-
JMOM
Energy
PSL
-
JMOM
Healthcare
PSL
-
JMOM
Real Estate
PSL
-
JMOM
Technology
PSL
-
JMOM
Utilities
PSL
-
JMOM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. JMOM — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
JMOM
PSL vs. JMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSL | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.31 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 3.66 | -3.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.05 | 13.51 | -12.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSL vs. JMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, which is greater than JMOM's maximum drawdown of -34.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and JMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -34.31% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -8.02% | -5.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -19.51% | +5.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.96% | -28.26% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.85% | -4.22% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.79% | -6.25% | +0.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.22% | 2.16% | +4.06% |
Volatility
PSL vs. JMOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 4.62%, while JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF (JMOM) has a volatility of 5.42%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JMOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | JMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.62% | 5.42% | -0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.82% | 14.02% | -4.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.66% | 16.54% | -2.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 19.00% | -3.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.54% | 20.17% | -3.63% |
PSL vs. JMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than JMOM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. JMOM - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than JMOM's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JMOM JPMorgan U.S. Momentum Factor ETF | 0.75% | 0.86% | 0.75% | 1.21% | 1.39% | 0.64% | 0.85% | 1.11% | 1.38% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.73% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and JMOM have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JMOM has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to PSL (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs JMOM's -34.31%.
On 5-year performance, JMOM leads with 13.81% vs 6.05% for PSL. On fees, JMOM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JMOM has performed better with a 13.81% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JMOM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
JMOM has the higher dividend yield at 0.75%, compared with 0.73% for PSL.
PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while JMOM tracks JP Morgan US Momentum Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.12% for JMOM.
JMOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and JMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer