PSL vs. PPA
PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and PPA (Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSL is a Momentum fund tracking the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while PPA is a Aerospace & Defense fund tracking the SPADE Defense Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 8.16%/yr vs 17.79%/yr for PPA. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for PPA.
Performance
PSL vs. PPA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 10.74% return, which is significantly higher than PPA's 9.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed PPA with an annualized return of 8.16%, while PPA has yielded a comparatively higher 17.79% annualized return.
PSL
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 10.74%
- 6M
- 9.53%
- 1Y
- 0.59%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 4.65%
- 10Y*
- 8.16%
PPA
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 0.95%
- YTD
- 9.76%
- 6M
- 7.56%
- 1Y
- 26.02%
- 3Y*
- 28.78%
- 5Y*
- 18.41%
- 10Y*
- 17.79%
PSL vs. PPA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 10.74% | -3.47% | 15.42% | 12.32% | -7.76% | 6.88% | 18.15% | 14.16% | 0.92% | 21.82% |
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 9.76% | 37.15% | 25.28% | 18.41% | 9.52% | 7.09% | 0.45% | 39.63% | -7.51% | 30.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSL and PPA is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2006 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between PSL and PPA has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
PSL vs. PPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSL
PPA
Consumer Defensive
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
PSL
PPA
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSL
PPA
-
Financial Services
PSL
PPA
Industrials
PSL
PPA
Basic Materials
PSL
-
PPA
-
Communication Services
PSL
-
PPA
Energy
PSL
-
PPA
-
Healthcare
PSL
-
PPA
-
Real Estate
PSL
-
PPA
-
Technology
PSL
-
PPA
Utilities
PSL
-
PPA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSL vs. PPA — Risk / Return Rank
PSL
PPA
PSL vs. PPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSL | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.23 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | 1.91 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | 5.29 | -5.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSL vs. PPA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum PPA drawdown of -57.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and PPA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSL | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.58% | -57.37% | +15.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -13.71% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.64% | -15.24% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.45% | -18.37% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.67% | -43.92% | +9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.00% | -7.37% | +2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.81% | -9.18% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.19% | 4.93% | +1.26% |
Volatility
PSL vs. PPA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 4.42%, while Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF (PPA) has a volatility of 8.40%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PPA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSL | PPA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 8.40% | -3.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 17.09% | -7.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.17% | 20.15% | -6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 18.70% | -3.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 20.73% | -4.21% |
PSL vs. PPA - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than PPA's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSL vs. PPA - Dividend Comparison
PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, more than PPA's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PPA Invesco Aerospace & Defense ETF | 0.37% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.67% | 0.83% | 0.59% | 0.88% | 0.95% | 0.90% | 0.67% | 1.70% | 1.41% |
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF | 0.76% | 0.93% | 0.60% | 1.37% | 1.98% | 1.24% | 0.80% | 0.47% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 2.08% | 1.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSL and PPA have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PPA has higher volatility (8.40%) compared to PSL (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs PPA's -57.37%.
On 10-year performance, PPA leads with 17.79% vs 8.16% for PSL. On fees, PPA is cheaper at 0.58% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PPA has performed better with a 17.79% return vs 8.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PPA is cheaper with a 0.58% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.
PSL has the higher dividend yield at 0.76%, compared with 0.37% for PPA.
PSL is categorized as Momentum, while PPA is Aerospace & Defense. PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while PPA tracks SPADE Defense Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.58% for PPA.
PPA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSL and PPA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer