PSL vs. EEMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSL (Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF) and EEMO (Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Invesco - PSL tracks the DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index while EEMO tracks the S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSL returned 7.88%/yr vs 8.88%/yr for EEMO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSL charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EEMO.

Performance

PSL vs. EEMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSL achieves a 9.10% return, which is significantly lower than EEMO's 40.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PSL has underperformed EEMO with an annualized return of 7.88%, while EEMO has yielded a comparatively higher 8.88% annualized return.

PSL

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: -1.77%
• YTD: 9.10%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: -1.02%
• 3Y*: 9.29%
• 5Y*: 3.68%
• 10Y*: 7.88%

EEMO

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 18.59%
• YTD: 40.25%
• 6M: 41.33%
• 1Y: 57.41%
• 3Y*: 25.30%
• 5Y*: 7.19%
• 10Y*: 8.88%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSL vs. EEMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF	9.10%	-3.47%	15.42%	12.32%	-7.76%	6.88%	18.15%	14.16%	0.92%	21.82%
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	40.25%	10.99%	9.88%	13.90%	-18.73%	-5.57%	9.66%	21.17%	-17.24%	49.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PSL and EEMO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.32
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012	0.34

The correlation between PSL and EEMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSL vs. EEMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSL	EEMO
Consumer Defensive	85.9%	1.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	3.2%
Financial Services	1.8%	18.0%
Industrials	1.5%	11.5%
Basic Materials	-	12.9%
Communication Services	-	1.5%
Energy	-	2.5%
Healthcare	-	3.0%
Real Estate	-	0.5%
Technology	-	43.8%
Utilities	-	2.0%

Return for Risk

PSL vs. EEMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSL

PSL Risk / Return Rank: 8
PSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
PSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
PSL Omega Ratio Rank: 7
PSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PSL Martin Ratio Rank: 8

EEMO

EEMO Risk / Return Rank: 75
EEMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EEMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
EEMO Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
EEMO Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSL vs. EEMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) and Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSL	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	2.36	-2.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.02	3.28	-3.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	1.46	-0.47
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.08	3.91	-3.99
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.17	15.67	-15.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSL vs. EEMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSL Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the EEMO Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSL and EEMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSL	EEMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	2.36	-2.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	0.37	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.48	0.41	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.55	0.13	+0.41

Drawdowns

PSL vs. EEMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSL drawdown since its inception was -41.58%, smaller than the maximum EEMO drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSL and EEMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSL	EEMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-41.58%	-48.47%	+6.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.64%	-14.75%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.64%	-26.06%	+12.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-22.35%	-34.03%	+11.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.67%	-46.57%	+11.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.41%	-1.32%	-5.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.82%	-20.17%	+14.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.09%	3.67%	+2.42%

Volatility

PSL vs. EEMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF (PSL) is 3.29%, while Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF (EEMO) has a volatility of 14.32%. This indicates that PSL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSL	EEMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.29%	14.32%	-11.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.51%	22.10%	-13.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.80%	24.45%	-11.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.15%	19.33%	-4.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.50%	21.59%	-5.09%

PSL vs. EEMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSL has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMO's 0.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSL vs. EEMO - Dividend Comparison

PSL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, less than EEMO's 1.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EEMO Invesco S&P Emerging Markets Momentum ETF	1.64%	2.31%	2.57%	3.65%	3.82%	1.51%	1.53%	2.13%	13.10%	5.13%	1.55%	2.92%
PSL Invesco DWA Consumer Staples Momentum ETF	0.84%	0.93%	0.60%	1.37%	1.98%	1.24%	0.80%	0.47%	0.75%	0.34%	2.08%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSL and EEMO in my portfolio?

PSL and EEMO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSL or EEMO?

EEMO has higher volatility (14.32%) compared to PSL (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSL dropped -41.58% vs EEMO's -48.47%.

Which ETF is better, PSL or EEMO?

On 10-year performance, EEMO leads with 8.88% vs 7.88% for PSL. On fees, EEMO is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, PSL has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSL or EEMO?

Over the 10-year period, EEMO has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 7.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSL or EEMO?

EEMO is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSL or EEMO?

EEMO has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.84% for PSL.

What is the main difference between PSL and EEMO?

PSL tracks DWA Consumer Staples Technical Leaders Index, while EEMO tracks S&P Momentum Emerging Plus LargeMidCap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSL and 0.31% for EEMO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EEMO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.