PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSIL vs. XLVI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSIL vs. XLVI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSIL achieves a 20.15% return, which is significantly higher than XLVI's -0.67% return.


PSIL

1D
-2.57%
1M
1.88%
YTD
20.15%
6M
23.74%
1Y
65.52%
3Y*
9.55%
5Y*
10Y*

XLVI

1D
0.67%
1M
2.30%
YTD
-0.67%
6M
0.76%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSIL vs. XLVI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PSIL and XLVI is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.31

PSIL vs. XLVI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSIL
XLVI

Healthcare

100.0%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

100.6%

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Healthcare

PSIL
100.0%
XLVI

-

Basic Materials

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Communication Services

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Consumer Defensive

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Energy

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Financial Services

PSIL

-

XLVI
100.6%

Industrials

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Real Estate

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Technology

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Utilities

PSIL

-

XLVI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSIL vs. XLVI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSIL
PSIL Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
PSIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

XLVI
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSIL vs. XLVI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF (PSIL) and State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLVI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSILXLVIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.82

PSIL vs. XLVI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSILXLVIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.42

1.33

-1.74

Drawdowns

PSIL vs. XLVI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIL drawdown since its inception was -92.72%, which is greater than XLVI's maximum drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIL and XLVI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSILXLVIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.72%

-8.14%

-84.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-64.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-76.63%

-4.02%

-72.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-76.76%

-1.95%

-74.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.63%

Volatility

PSIL vs. XLVI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSILXLVIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

27.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.80%

10.94%

+30.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

63.15%

10.94%

+52.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.15%

10.94%

+52.21%

PSIL vs. XLVI - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSIL has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than XLVI's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSIL vs. XLVI - Dividend Comparison

PSIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.32%, less than XLVI's 11.53% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
PSIL
AdvisorShares Psychedelics ETF
8.32%10.95%1.49%0.24%2.91%
XLVI
State Street Health Care Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.53%5.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSIL and XLVI have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLVI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLVI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for PSIL.

XLVI has the higher dividend yield at 11.53%, compared with 8.32% for PSIL.

PSIL is categorized as Health & Biotech Equities, while XLVI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: AdvisorShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for PSIL and 0.35% for XLVI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIL and XLVI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer