PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSHG vs. FLNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PSHG vs. FLNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) and FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSHG achieves a -22.07% return, which is significantly lower than FLNG's 27.30% return.


PSHG

1D
-0.30%
1M
-6.74%
6M
-17.41%
YTD
-22.07%
1Y
-11.70%
3Y*
26.47%
5Y*
-54.10%
10Y*
-76.60%

FLNG

1D
0.43%
1M
-3.64%
6M
22.30%
YTD
27.30%
1Y
46.51%
3Y*
11.33%
5Y*
30.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSHG vs. FLNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.
-22.07%14.52%-18.06%-35.88%-93.64%-18.82%-44.53%-12.50%
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
27.30%22.47%-11.61%-1.19%56.32%202.13%-17.14%0.15%

Correlation

The correlation between PSHG and FLNG is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 17, 2019

0.14

The correlation between PSHG and FLNG shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PSHG:

$20.64M

FLNG:

$1.63B

EPS

PSHG:

$1.28

FLNG:

$1.40

PE Ratio

PSHG:

1.30

FLNG:

21.57

PS Ratio

PSHG:

0.77

FLNG:

4.80

PB Ratio

PSHG:

0.20

FLNG:

2.34

Total Revenue (TTM)

PSHG:

$84.17M

FLNG:

$339.66M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PSHG:

$46.14M

FLNG:

$170.74M

EBITDA (TTM)

PSHG:

$68.02M

FLNG:

$238.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSHG vs. FLNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSHG
PSHG Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PSHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PSHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FLNG
FLNG Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FLNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLNG Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FLNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLNG Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSHG vs. FLNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) and FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSHGFLNGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.30

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.33

3.45

-3.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.61

10.62

-11.23

PSHG vs. FLNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSHG Sharpe Ratio is -0.23, which is lower than the FLNG Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSHG and FLNG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSHG vs. FLNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSHG drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than FLNG's maximum drawdown of -71.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSHG and FLNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSHGFLNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-71.92%

-28.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.69%

-13.55%

-22.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.27%

-25.37%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.23%

-31.05%

-68.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-7.14%

-92.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-87.28%

-18.65%

-68.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.19%

4.40%

+14.79%

Volatility

PSHG vs. FLNG - Volatility Comparison

Performance Shipping Inc. (PSHG) and FLEX LNG Ltd (FLNG) have volatilities of 10.77% and 11.28%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSHGFLNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.77%

11.28%

-0.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.27%

20.77%

+14.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.95%

26.83%

+24.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

87.01%

39.27%

+47.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

166.06%

47.22%

+118.84%

Dividends

PSHG vs. FLNG - Dividend Comparison

PSHG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLNG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.95%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd
9.95%12.02%13.08%11.61%10.71%7.88%2.29%0.92%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSHG
Performance Shipping Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.44%1.25%

Financials

PSHG vs. FLNG - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Performance Shipping Inc. and FLEX LNG Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
26.16M
80.46M
(PSHG) Total Revenue
(FLNG) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PSHG vs. FLNG - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Performance Shipping Inc. and FLEX LNG Ltd over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.1%
45.7%
Portfolio components
PSHG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Performance Shipping Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.38M and revenue of 26.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.1%.

FLNG - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a gross profit of 36.75M and revenue of 80.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.7%.

PSHG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Performance Shipping Inc. reported an operating income of 10.16M and revenue of 26.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 38.9%.

FLNG - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported an operating income of 34.20M and revenue of 80.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.5%.

PSHG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Performance Shipping Inc. reported a net income of 7.56M and revenue of 26.16M, resulting in a net margin of 28.9%.

FLNG - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, FLEX LNG Ltd reported a net income of 19.51M and revenue of 80.46M, resulting in a net margin of 24.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PSHG and FLNG have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FLNG has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to PSHG (10.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSHG dropped -100.00% vs FLNG's -71.92%.

FLNG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs -0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSHG and FLNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer